Why does making things dimensioned in imperial present problems. If the plans say one inch just make the part 25.4 mm. You will have less trouble than trying to convert everything to metric first.
Brass sheet is generally only available in mm thicknesses these days so the nearest equivalent will do but keep all other dimensions the same.
…
Go for it.
regards Martin
As I understand it this clock calls for many parts to be made from Imperial stock. For example, wheels (gears) cut from 1/16″ Brass plate, that align to mesh with other gears.
1/16″ is a little under 1.6mm, so 1.5mm Metric plate is probably close enough with minor adjustments. But is the same true of parts intended to be made from 1/8″, 3/16″ , 1/4″ and larger Imperial plate, angle and rod?
I’ve often substituted 6mm for 1/4″ but occasionally find metric rod is uncomfortably small for some applications. Likewise, 10mm rod usually substitutes well enough for 3/8″ but occasionally has to be turned down because it fouls something else.
I guess the answer depends on how much dimensional flexibility there is in the build. Adapting a tightly packed design from Imperial stock to Metric (or vice versa) might require a lot of tweaking.
Anyone built a Congreve from metric stock? Was it easy or difficult?
Dave