Posted by Peter Sansom on 19/02/2019 00:38:33:
Which means the archives will be unavailable to most people who keep their software up to date. Google removed Java support from Chrome several years ago as part of security updates, you cannot install the Java plugin for Chrome and run Java plugins. Yes, today Java is still used on websites, but that is running Java on the server.
Firefox changed their plugin method about 18 months ago. They provided about 6 months ability to run legacy plugins. If the plugins were not rewritten they stopped working.
That is the future of Flash it will die and we will not be able to access the archives.
Surely, after they get the new viewer working someone can find a script on the web to convert from flash to the new viewer. Certainly there will be one to convert to HTML5, the Java replacement.
Withthe PocketMags viewer I have had an email confirming that the is a bug in the current release preventing printing when using Chrome, the bug is confirmed. They are working to fix the printing bug.
Peter
I hope the outlook isn't that grim!
Flash is just one way of delivering content stored on a server and displaying it on a client. There are several alternatives. It's unlikely that the archives are stored in a special Flash proprietary format that can't possibly be delivered to a client by anything else. More likely, the source documents are standard file types that most packages can read.
It is true that moving from one reader to another isn't always glitch free! The chief danger is that someone was persuaded in the past to archive magazines produced by long obsolete software in a non-portable way. Such can be difficult to disentangle.
The demise of Flash is a good thing – although it met a real need, the software was designed before security was well understood, and then programmed naively with little concern for security. Over several years it became apparent Flash was built on sand. It turned out to be difficult and expensive to retrofit security without breaking functionality and the product was involved in multiple security incidents. An analogy would be building a bungalow and then trying to convert it to secure £100M in cash. You can't just put a few bars on the windows and fit a B&Q burglar alarm…
At the same time industry learned a lot from Flash and other security experiences, and its replacements are more functional, performant, and trustworthy.
On the other hand, when it comes to upgrading software, we all know " if something can go wrong, it will!"
Dave