I like hard copies of magazines and books. They belong to me, I can do what I like with them and there's nothing the publishers can do about it. I can lend a hard copy to my friends or sell it to a dealer.
With a digital copy it's different. I don't own the copy. I can't lend it out and I can't sell it. I have merely bought the right to read it for as long as the publisher decides to grant me that right. The publisher can withdraw that right at any time he thinks fit. He can even remotely delete it from any reading device it's loaded on.
The extra cost of producing and distributing a digital edition is I suspect fairly small, as presumably the input to the printer is the digital edition or something very similar.
Unfortunately it looks like some bean counter has asked "Why are we giving free acces to our archive? We could be making money out of it". This is a publisher's decision, not an editorial one, which I suspect is why the editors have understandably been reluctant to contribute to this thread. They don't want to offend their masters who pay their wages.
I have no fear of technology, but I'll stick with a paper copy of the mags as long as they're available.
Max.