Posted by Chris TickTock on 14/01/2021 17:43:05: …
Obviously or should I say I think flat smooth brass must have a lower friction rating that rough but making the surfaces rough would reduce contact area.
…
Chris
I'm not qualified on the clock aspect of this but a few general remarks may help.
Although there's a relationship between surface area and friction, I don't think there's much reason to worry about a bit of roughening in this case.
When a smooth bar runs on rollers across a flat surface, friction is almost zero provided nothing bends. But when the bar hits an end-stop, it can't move even though the contact area is low. So on one hand low surface area means low friction, on the other it doesn't. Designers exploit this all the time.

Two rough surfaces can engage with low surface area and still have high friction:

But! How a rough surface behaves over time is likely to change. In the above example pressure at the contact points is high, so the material tends to deform or cut, i.e. the two blocks polish each other and friction drops. However, once polished flat another effect may kick in: If both materials are soft, the whole surface may tear, causing friction to rise again.
One way of controlling friction is to make the contacts out of different materials, one of which is harder than the other. Then the hard material tends to dig into the soft one, keeping friction high until the soft side wears out. Disc brakes are a sophisticated implementation; the disc is polished hardened steel, while the brake blocks are soft and replaceable. Not any old soft, pads are made of a hard material embedded in a softer matrix, both which are heat resistant. The combination balances friction and wear so vehicles stop efficiently without having to fit new brake blocks every 50 miles.
In a clock, the soft side could be paint, or a fibre washer but materials like that don't last. Instead the existing arrangement features a steel spring pressing on a brass plate. I think this is good design, but what could possibly go wrong?
One possibility is that the brass has work or age hardened over the years, and the spring now skates over it. Another is that the spring started with a sharp edge, and it's worn flat. A third is the spring has lost tension and brakes more weakly than when new. Dirt may be acting as a lubricant: kitchen grease and nicotine are both slippery. In an old clock, all these factors might work together to reduce the mechanism's grip.
Practically then, the answer could be sharpen the spring bearing edge if it's rounded, or to gently rough up the brass especially if it looks burnished, or just a good clean. Theory – if a practical horologist disagrees, listen to him!
Also possible the problem is the other way round, where a sharp strong spring has embedded itself deep into soft brass and jambed. Doesn't fit the symptoms though.
I can see why people like working on mechanical clocks – very interesting.
Dave