It is common to use what is called a "motor circuit protector" in motor control centers, which is a circuit breaker with the instantaneous function only, and no overload.
The overload is not needed with a motor control center, since the starter has overload protection in it.
I made the mistake of allowing IEC rated starters on one project many years ago, and the contacts were so tiny and fragile that they started failing not too long after installation.
These days (in the US) I specify that all products must be UL listed and labeled, and they must also be NEMA rated. I don't allow anything to be IEC. I do industrial design work, and the equipment must be industrial-rated, else it will not last very long under the harsh conditions that it sees.
The things I look for in a breaker are the manufacturer (I generally spec three mainstream manufacturers for electrical equipment, and don't allow any others), UL listing and label (which means it has been tested and verified to perform as designed and intended), and after today I will check the physical weight of any breaker that I personally purchase.
As they say "Let the buyer beware".
The UL listing process is a very rigorous one, and it tests produces under a wide variety of temperatures, etc. Many electrical products fail for thermal reasons, ie: they overheat due to various reasons, mainly it seems due to connections and contact points not remaining tight.
You could make a very inexpensive and dangerous product if you ignore the UL testing, and apparently some do exactly that. But same as buying an auto. Don't buy a Hugo, Pinto, Corvair, etc. unless you are a collector.
Remember the old adage "Unsafe at any speed?".
.
Edited By PatJ on 02/02/2021 05:21:45
Edited By PatJ on 02/02/2021 05:23:58