How to reduce head diameter of countersunk wood screw?

Advert

How to reduce head diameter of countersunk wood screw?

Home Forums Materials How to reduce head diameter of countersunk wood screw?

Viewing 18 posts - 26 through 43 (of 43 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #755550
    File Handle
    Participant
      @filehandle

      Mick
      Last night I checked my own supply of 4 by 1/2″slotted screws – at that price mine are worth over £100. my whole stock of slotted screws would be worth thousands. However, I was in a hardware shop this morning, their price was 2p each for this size, by the feel of it the box they had was virtually full, although if I recall correctly I paid 50p for mine – a nearly full box of new very old stock.
      But I can understand why new one are that expensive, demand will be low, so prices are high.
      I got to wondering how much useful old new stock is around in the country? I bet a lot is simply discarded.
      last night I did a very quick Internet search and found 25 for £5 – probably plus postage.

      Advert
      #755584
      Mick Bailey
      Participant
        @mickbailey28509

        I see boxes of British made screws at car boots and they don’t sell. My joiner friend offered a few dozen boxes of unopened Nettlefold screws and I declined as I already have more than I could use in my remaining days. They got dumped, as he was in the same position.

        #756013
        ega
        Participant
          @ega

          In case anyone is interested here are Clive’s slitting saws:

          Slitting saws

          I suppose it would be possible to grind the set off a standard blade.

          PS Still not possible to upload a PDF!

          #756024
          JasonB
          Moderator
            @jasonb

            Try putting it in a “document” gallery, works for me.

            Those blades are a bit thick for the size of screws I make, 0.8mm or around 30thou is the most common I use.

            #756034
            Michael Gilligan
            Participant
              @michaelgilligan61133
              On ega Said:
              […] I suppose it would be possible to grind the set off a standard blade.

              Yes … I demonstrated the practicality of that a little while ago

              … will post a link to the topic later, if I can find it

              MichaelG.

              #756043
              Clive Foster
              Participant
                @clivefoster55965

                ega

                Thats very interesting. I knew of the Starrett 249 saws but had never seen any. Thought they were finer teeth actually.

                My sample inspected today and considered good so now time to find some screws. Lets see if my Google Fu is as good as File Handle.

                Clive

                #756058
                Michael Gilligan
                Participant
                  @michaelgilligan61133

                  Found it at last … The currently-final post, here:

                  https://www.model-engineer.co.uk/forums/topic/conventional-hacksaw-blades-in-junior-size/page/2/

                  MichaelG.

                  #756085
                  ega
                  Participant
                    @ega

                    JasonB:

                    Thanks for the tip.

                    I agree that the Starrett blades seem quite thick and a finer pitch would be easier to start on the cut, no doubt what Clive had in mind.

                    MichaelG:

                    Your photo is a rather nice demonstration of the wave set of these blades.

                    #756123
                    Michael Gilligan
                    Participant
                      @michaelgilligan61133
                      On ega Said:
                      MichaelG:
                      Your photo is a rather nice demonstration of the wave set of these blades.

                      Thanks, ega … that’s as I hoped

                      The flattening is a little slow and ‘iterative’ when using a hand-held Eze-Lap, but it works nicely …

                      It would be a doodle for someone with a surface-grinder and a magnetic chuck.

                      MichaelG.

                      .

                      Edit: __ This was my ‘weapon of choice’

                      .IMG_0133

                      #756271
                      david bennett 8
                      Participant
                        @davidbennett8

                        The now vintage Eclipse 4S tool included various thicknes’s

                         

                        of slotting saws. Still available occasionally at auction.

                        dave8

                        #756372
                        bernard towers
                        Participant
                          @bernardtowers37738

                          Id be interested to know how you would do that Michael, I sat at my S/G for a while and thought it difficult.

                          #756408
                          Michael Gilligan
                          Participant
                            @michaelgilligan61133
                            On bernard towers Said:

                            Id be interested to know how you would do that Michael, I sat at my S/G for a while and thought it difficult.

                            I would take an appropriate thickness of shim-stock and lay the flat portion of a hacksaw blade upon it, on a long magnetic chuck then just gently grind. Flip over and do the same on t’other face.

                            The wavy pattern that I produced manually should appear as-if-by-magic

                            … am I missing some hidden trap ?

                            MichaelG.

                            .

                            Note: __ The majority of the blade is flat, the wavy set is confined to quite a narrow band:

                            .

                            IMG_9176

                            #756441
                            bernard towers
                            Participant
                              @bernardtowers37738

                              In the original post it stated that the screws were down a hole so why do you need to be slotting when the screw just needs a 10 thou cut off the dia?

                              #756449
                              Clive Foster
                              Participant
                                @clivefoster55965

                                Bernard

                                The holes are very shallow. Perhaps 10 or 15 thou showing above the sharp edged countersunk screws originally used. Depending on the detail proportions of the heads on the screws I’ve ordered I may just be able to trim a bit off the top so things fit in the hole without loosing too much of the slot. Or I may have to deepen the slot a little so the screw driver has something to bite on.

                                Fortunately only about 8 of the screws are that critical as holding moving parts of the action together. For the rest we may be able to get away with running the countersink deeper. For those holding parts of the action together I’m also going to have to take the tips off the screws so they don’t stick out the other side. Just as the original builder did!

                                Given that the piano was made in the 1780’s I’m impressed by both the tight tolerances it is made to and the consistency of the screws.

                                Clive

                                #756515
                                Graham Meek
                                Participant
                                  @grahammeek88282

                                  If you are worried about about the raw edge of the screw showing above the plate. Then why not Dome the screws?

                                  This will remove the offending edge yet still retain the depth of slot for much of its width. This used to be a common practice years ago, with screws being produced this way as standard.

                                  Regards

                                  Gray,

                                  #756540
                                  Michael Gilligan
                                  Participant
                                    @michaelgilligan61133
                                    On Graham Meek Said:
                                    […] This used to be a common practice years ago, with screws being produced this way as standard.

                                    Known by Nettlefolds as ‘Raised’

                                    MichaelG.

                                    .

                                    profile illustrated here: https://www.rodnaylor.com/shop/restoration-materials/restoration-materials-veneer-other/nettlefolds-screws-number-3-x-38-raised-x-50/

                                    #756550
                                    Clive Foster
                                    Participant
                                      @clivefoster55965

                                      On Graham Meek Said:

                                      If you are worried about about the raw edge of the screw showing above the plate. Then why not Dome the screws?

                                      This will remove the offending edge yet still retain the depth of slot for much of its width. This used to be a common practice years ago, with screws being produced this way as standard.

                                      Regards

                                      Gray,

                                      Unfortunately Nigel says the critical ones in the action can’t be proud out the wood because it would interfere with something. Not enough material to alter the holes either. Frankly I’m surprised that its survived given how skinny the parts are. Moving parts of the action so absolute minimum of wood used to keep them as light as possible. Three sets are broken. Nigel says reproducing them is going to be interesting.

                                      Clive

                                      #756560
                                      Michael Gilligan
                                      Participant
                                        @michaelgilligan61133

                                        Regarding the ‘flattening’  of Red-Stripe blades …

                                        For what it’s worth:

                                        Starrett’s nominal dimensions for the 1232 are given here:

                                        https://www.starrett.co.uk/product-category/pta-hand-saw-blades/hand-hacksaw-blades-frames/redstripe-hand-hacksaw-blades/

                                        and I measure the original kerf at about 1.02mm +/- 0.02

                                        [ using the reasonably-trusty digital caliper at several locations on one randomly selected new blade ]

                                        MichaelG.

                                         

                                      Viewing 18 posts - 26 through 43 (of 43 total)
                                      • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                                      Advert

                                      Latest Replies

                                      Home Forums Materials Topics

                                      Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                                      Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                                      View full reply list.

                                      Advert

                                      Newsletter Sign-up