I'm intrigued as to what high-precision flat surfaces are used for in a home-workshop? When exactly does extreme flatness matter and why?
In a tool-room or metrology lab it's obvious. A standard needs to be about 10 times better than the gauge or jig being calibrated or set. Usually the goal of manufacturing is making interchangeable parts within tolerances. That's a good reason for owning a good surface table, but meeting that requirement it's unwise to buy second-hand off ebay and hope it's OK. When interchangeable accuracy is required, surface tables are carefully set-up, kept clean, maintained. and periodically recalibrated. There are, I think, three different grades of surface table, and the better the grade the more fuss is made about keeping them in good condition. High grade surface plates are laboratory instruments, completely over the top for most tool-room purposes.
In my workshop, which admittedly may not be typical, I don't work to tolerances. Instead I use the older technique of 'fitting'. For example, making a cylinder and piston for an engine, I would first bore and finish the cylinder to nominal size. Then I'd make the piston slightly larger and finish it to fit the cylinder. Using the cylinder as a gauge allows me to make an accurate fit, highly accurate if I put the effort in. But it's not a precision fit because the piston and cylinder are matched relative to each other, not to absolute dimensions. If I make two cylinders/piston pairs, it's unlikely that swapped pistons would fit properly in the other cylinder. They are not interchangeable.
The point about fitting is that good results can be achieved without elaborate measurement, hence there's no particular need for me to own high-end measuring gear of any type. In earlier times craftsmen did extraordinary work with very simple measurement aids – it's amazing what can be done with a pair of dividers and a home-made lathe. In practice, being able to measure accurately saves time. On the lathe I mostly use a digital caliper; it measures with reasonable accuracy, and the locked blades can be used as a size comparator. When more precision is needed I reach for my very ordinary micrometer, I have no need for microns. I have DRO on my mill, but it's a time saver rather than essential to accuracy. I could get the same results with primitive methods.
Flatness isn't top of my list; an ordinary lump of work-top is good enough for setting-up most of the time, then I have a milling table, and – rarely – might get the float glass out.
As I don't do scraping and rarely transfer dimensions with a scribe block, what's my Business Case for buying a surface plate? I think Andrew's in much the same place as me except he wants to improve his mini-lathe. His resources are a budget DTI and some steel-plates, and he said ' They mostly seem to involve a surface plate, which is not a cheap item.'
In that case MichaelG's immediate reply suggesting float glass seems spot on to me.
Of course, we've all failed to answer the exam question which was "Many people must have improved their mini lathe performance. How have they done it?"
Based on my mini-lathe experience, I suggest it's a mistake to rush to the internet and review all the existing advice for ideas. This can be highly misleading because what people have done depends on their particular lathe. For example, when mine arrived I expected to find it plastered in chicken fat, poorly assembled, and with fairly obvious improvements to do like replacing the steel gibs with brass, plastic gears with steel etc.
Actually mine arrived in good order. It did have a few issues but these only became obvious after I'd learned how to use it. My advice 'If ain't bust don't fix it'. Instead, use the lathe to make several test pieces, facing, turning, drilling and boring. Bear in mind that the characteristics of materials, cutting tools, and cutting speeds all have to be learnt too. The lathe may only one third of the problem! Avoid jumping to conclusions until the operator can tell the difference between trainee mistakes and machine problems. But, if consistently getting a poor result, it's time to focus on what might be causing it. Asking on the forum is a good place to start. Describe what you are trying to do, and what's wrong with the result. Photos help enormously. Doing that will produce a list of potential causes and how to test them. Focussing also helps filter internet searches and avoid information overload.
I think most self-taught beginners go through a dazed and confused stage. Don't worry, it passes. My epiphany came when I realised turning random scrap-metal was a bad mistake. Far better to invest in alloys intended to be machined. Suddenly my lathe stopped struggling and started cutting properly…
Dave