Thanks for the Andy Ross and David Urwick articles, Ian, you are a champion. The rider engine seems to be the way to go for more power per cc. Interesting, too, how phase angle is determined on the Ross yoke by the distance of the upright of the T from the crank pin.
Also of interest is the different assertions by both writers about dead space. Ross asserts that dead space in the cold section is detrimental to performance but Urwick says that he tried different lengths of tube up to 6 feet between the power cylinder and the working cylinder with little difference in performance. This last view is supported by Read in his book Stirling Engines where experiment showed that dead space was less a problem in the cold end than the hot end. Urwick seems to be saying, as I asserted, that the air in the lower third of the engine is merely a vehicle to transfer the pulse of pressure to the piston and plays no part in the transfer of heat to and from the fluid.
How about a thought experiment: imagine a long room with all windows closed and a door at the north end and a door at the south end. The door at the south end is slightly ajar and the door at the north end is closed. Someone opens the north door and without delay the south door shuts from the instant pressure changes in the room. I have seen this happen – might explain a few ghost stories, what think ye? This sounds a bit like the mystery of: “If a log falls in the forest and there are no ears nearby does it make a noise?”.
Anyway, enough rambling. I have been conned by my Grandson’s cousin to make him an engine too; and that is occupying my time at the moment, my own engines are on hold for the time being. My grand son’s engine now has a small generator to power a transistor radio, and a safer meths burner with fire box along the lines of yours but with a fibre glass wick.
Mark