HI Gordon, I see your point as I made a displacer that was peppered wth holes at each end and filled with poly pads, yet the engine ran. I want to try it on my reliable old engine to see if that still holds good because that engine refused to run with a small crack at the hot end of its displacer. Sealed displacers raises the question about moving regenerators that are tolally unsealed. Most of the books I have read on this subject say that if the displacer is made from thin aluminium or very thin steel, a tiny hole may be drilled in the base to allow some pressure inside stopping the walls collapsing.
All very confusing but it shows there are things about these engines that are yet to be discovered. That’s what is so good about this forum, we can all try things out and report our results – even if not very scientifically – to our fellow postees.
See if you can get an Artlcle by David Urwick (“Stirling Engines” More research and development). from ME18 Feb 1977 it makes for interesting reading on the subject of moving regenerators – in other words open displacers – and dead space volumes.
Just as an after thought, I wonder if all has something to do with total swept volumes. The magic numbers I’ve seen are 1:1.5 power cylinder to working cylinder ratio. Yet a rider has in most cases a 1:1 swept ratio. It would be interesting to see if a hole in the displacer-like extension to the hot piston made a difference.
Ian, can you post a link to that site you were looking regarding balancing yokes.
Mark
Edited By Mark Smith 3 on 04/01/2010 19:42:34
Edited By Mark Smith 3 on 04/01/2010 19:44:55