Don't want to get too drawn into this.
Let me make an analogy. A friend of mine who was a calligrapher used to say to people who complained to him about the price of script that: 'it had only taken him 10 minutes'. 'No it hadn't. It has taken me 30 years'.
And Brian Abbott is right. Of course, a skilled worker is entitled to the just rewards of his craft. 'The labourer is worthy of his hire', as one very worthwhile book says.
I'm a trained journalist (a rare breed these days) and for many years I made a decent living out of writing. I've also done scores of jobs gratis because one likes to help people who may not be as adept in a particular field as oneself. Brian's argument
Isn't that the fundamental point here. And in the case of engineering, rather than journalism, any decent person is going to reimburse for the materials.
I'm not sure we can make judgements about scrap people have 'pulled out of a hedge'. But an awful lot of people, especially in the UK, need to take a reality check in thinking any old heap of rubbish is worth a fortune just because it's old. But then antique and many classic car dealers couldn't function outside that premise!
Finally, I do think we need to recognise that a lot of what we do has no material value and maybe we shouldn't be involved if we have monetary worth in our sights. I don't want to be in any way offensive but in 2015 what is the point of a stationary engine other than for it's own sake, or for that matter, the old Austin engines I rebuild?
Could someone pop around and just help our friend in Exeter?