Posted by UncouthJ on 10/10/2022 18:37:19:
It's ok, I'm a prat!
Read the LPR article… Thought "yep yep yep…"
Read it again and realised my error!
I'd just inserted the bar by hand. Took it out gave it and the socket a wipe and gave it a clump home with the wooden mallet. Now I've got 0.03 runout registering along the whole bar. Which although still needs dialing in, isn't near as dire as it appeared earlier.
Leaving the post up for others to learn from my shame!
Jay
Headstock alignment will have no influence at all over eccentric runout of a test bar as the lathe spindle is rotated.
Your .03mm runout is most likely due to either burrs or bruises or other distortion on the 50 year old tapered hole in the middle of your spindle. (Even reaming the hole will not guarantee it is concentric with the outer spindle diameter. The reamer follows the existing hole) Or a small piece of grit between the tapers. Or it's not being seated exactly evenly. Or, and this is quite likely, due to very poor manufacturing standards of hobby grade test bars by low cost far-eastern suppliers.
The best thing you can do with your test bar is toss it away.
If you want to measure spindle runout, run a dial indicator directly on the spindle collar where the chuck mounts and rotate the spindle.
If you want to check and adjust headstock to bed alignment, the best method for old lathes is detailed in the Myford ML7 Users Manual.
This method works best because it measures what the lathe is actually doing under real world circumstances. It takes into account bed wear (which can throw a sensitive level off kilter) and cutting forces etc (which can provide a different result from a perfect reading with test bar like yours in a static test.).