Posted by ian voller on 02/04/2022 11:27:28:
Suffolk born and bred, strong in the arm thick in the head. ![face 1 face 1]()
Gear design is difficult. The designer not only has to cut the right number of teeth, but the teeth have to mesh with another gear without jambing, and, especially in a clock, with low friction. The other problem with poorly shaped gears is they wear rapidly.
Low friction and wear requires the flanks and valleys have to be curved in a particular way, the idea being the teeth roll over each other rather than bump and grind.
In days of yore, the gear wheels used in mills, were shaped approximately and they ground themselves to a moderately efficient shape. On first fit, the mill would be stiff and underpowered. After running for a while, the teeth would wear closer to the right shape and the mill would run free at full power. Unfortunately, the teeth rarely settle into the exact shape needed, so they wear rapidly. For that reason the teeth in traditional mills were usually replaceable.
Clockmakers were first to put effort into finding an optimum curve. Mathematically, it's a hypocycloid, and understanding what that is allows really good gears to be made. The maths are difficult and were cracked in the 16th Century by the Italian genius Gerolamo Cardano. Still a steep learning curve for non-mathematicians.
Later, it was realised that the Hypocycloid curve is inferior for most purposes to the Involute, described by another genius (Huygens), a century later. Apart from clocks, almost all modern gears are of Involute form. Clockmakers firmly believe hypocycloids are best for gearing up light mechanisms that don't transfer power. In contrast, involutes have several advantages: including being best for transmitting power and easier to make accurately. Unfortunately another steep learning curve.
Controversial view: I think satisfactory clocks can be made with involute gears. (SoD puts Tin Hat on and retreats to bunker.)
Ideally, a clock design would provide an exact recipe!
- Hold a disc of diameter x in a rotary table,
- set the dividing plate and clock-hands up to count the required number of gears
- Put a module cutter of given size in the milling spindle
- Cut n teeth
![]()
![modulecutter.jpg modulecutter.jpg]()
This is OK as long as the tools are affordable. ( Just because a child needs shoes 'She Who Must be Obeyed' often makes a silly fuss about 'Man in Shed' spending another few hundred quid on more toys!) However, most of the theory can be avoided unless you have to roll your own using one of the other, cheaper, methods.
I think most of us have to mix book learning with hands-on before machining makes sense.
Dave