Free Electricity

Advert

Free Electricity

Home Forums Electronics in the Workshop Free Electricity

Viewing 15 posts - 26 through 40 (of 40 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #391496
    Harry Wilkes
    Participant
      @harrywilkes58467

      It's been suggested two 6" nails will produce free electricity and again so I'm told if your supplier finds out it could result in a stay in one of her majesty's hotels, a room,3 meals a day TV along with other com wink

      H

      Advert
      #391497
      John MC
      Participant
        @johnmc39344
        Posted by not done it yet on 16/01/2019 20:23:45:

        Not so free if and when you wish to sell your house. The legalities, etc likely cost the vendor thousands. These rented roofs are a minefield for potential house purchasers. Far better to install your own kit and avoid the third party renters of equipment. They will go mostly go out of fashion when the FIT scheme finishes in a couple of months time. Doubtless they will come up with some other money spinning scheme…

        Absolutely, a real minefield when it comes to house sales and maintenance of the building. Also a number of hidden cost with these rented roof installations, homeowners paying for the cost of scaffolding for the initial installation, costs for an "annual inspection", cleaning costs. There were others I found when researching this. Each installer, it seemed to me, had there own crafty ways of maximising there earnings!

        I bought my own installation, for me by far the best option. I worked out that I would get my money back in about 8.5 years, just checked this and am on course for that, if no component failures happen.

        I also had an immersion heater controller fitted with the panels at a very good price, in the summer that gives me all the hot water we need at a very, very low cost.

        #391499
        not done it yet
        Participant
          @notdoneityet

          Too right, JM! mgnbuk might be one of the lucky ones who can use all the energy generated. Many cannot and still have higher building insurance costs as well as all the other tricks the roof renters get up to.

          The Solic 200 PV diverters were only about £150 at one time and with simple straightforward installation. Not the best use of high grade energy (unless the property is all-electric) – and solar thermal might be better (if space permits) – but keeps the heating costs down, all the same. There are umpteen instances where the property sells for less, because of the rented roof, or problems when a roof-renter is taken over by another company…

          #391515
          john fletcher 1
          Participant
            @johnfletcher1

            Wife and I made our own Solar hot water system more than 35 years ago controlled by a 741 two thermistors and a relay and we installed it all. It worked faultlessly for 26 years, then came along PV panels. Getting older and less agile we decided to have the Solar system removed and have PV system installed. We were one of the first in our area to have panel fitted and we get 52p for every unit generated. and 4p for some thing else. We have a box which allows us to use our immersion heater from the system. Obviously other electrical users must be paying over the odds for their electricity for us to be paid so generously. In 7 years our system has paid for itself and hopefully will continue to do so. John

            #391518
            Geoff Theasby
            Participant
              @geofftheasby

              John, Yes, a solar panel would be the modern way. Tracking the LO would not work with a simple, non-superhet radio, trf, direct conversion, or SDR. The last has a crystal oscillator 'clock' to drive the electronics, but it is very low power, and easily shielded.

              #391543
              Ian S C
              Participant
                @iansc

                When I was a kid we built crystal sets, and late 50s got some OC 70 transistors, so made a simple amplifier with a single OC 70, then Dad suggested build another crystal set with broad tuning, instead of the single diode, a bridge made of 4 germanium diodes and an electrolytic capacitor across it, adjust the circuit for the greatest out put, and connect it to the radio. You need 2 good aerials. The main problem with simple radios is the headphones, in general you just can't get high impedance phones.

                When I built my first (only) single valve(DAF 91) radio, what to do about HT battery.  Built a power supply with a transistor oscilator, feed that through a small low voltage transformer, rectify the HT, and smooth it, and out comes the 90V that I wanted, all from a little 9V battery.

                Ian S C

                Edited By Ian S C on 17/01/2019 11:45:55

                #391547
                ronan walsh
                Participant
                  @ronanwalsh98054
                  Posted by Ian S C on 17/01/2019 11:32:43:

                  When I was a kid we built crystal sets, and late 50s got some OC 70 transistors, so made a simple amplifier with a single OC 70, then Dad suggested build another crystal set with broad tuning, instead of the single diode, a bridge made of 4 germanium diodes and an electrolytic capacitor across it, adjust the circuit for the greatest out put, and connect it to the radio. You need 2 good aerials. The main problem with simple radios is the headphones, in general you just can't get high impedance phones.

                  When I built my first (only) single valve(DAF 91) radio, what to do about HT battery. Built a power supply with a transistor oscilator, feed that through a small low voltage transformer, rectify the HT, and smooth it, and out comes the 90V that I wanted, all from a little 9V battery.

                  Ian S C

                  Edited By Ian S C on 17/01/2019 11:45:55

                  Yes i did that too, making crystal sets. Ladybird did a little book on it, all the bits held to a piece of pine board (pre-mdf) with brass screws (remember them) and screw cups. I believe pow's made sets using a piece of coke, which was scratched at with a wire until a signal was received.

                  Kids don't make things like that anymore, they sit gawping at mobile phone screens now.

                  #391554
                  SillyOldDuffer
                  Moderator
                    @sillyoldduffer
                    Posted by Andrew Johnston on 16/01/2019 16:47:05:

                    The original T&Cs for my amateur radio licence, back in the 1970s, banned end-fed wire antennas longer than, I think, 75 feet. That was because in the early days of radio people near the long wave transmitters were extracting enough energy to power a light bulb or two.

                    Andrew

                    Pedant Alert!

                    I think Andrew misremembers a condition from the old Broadcast Radio Licence. Before TV went big you had to have a Wireless Licence to listen legally to a radio in the UK. Later (about 1970?) this difficult to enforce requirement was dropped. Since then BBC services are funded from the TV licence money and commercial services by advertising (usually).

                    The 75 foot limit dates to before the War when Regenerative receivers where common. A home aerial would typically be a wire strung from the chimney to a pole at the end of the garden. Regenerative receivers require the operator to achieve selectivity by adjusting an RF amplifier and tuning coil close to oscillation. (It has the effect of improving Q)

                    Large numbers of people would get this wrong and would have their sets oscillating because real men never read instructions or care about their neighbours! Coupled direct into an end-fed antenna in the garden, the resulting howl could travel several miles. Insisting receive antennas were less than 75 foot long much reduced the nuisance by restricting the wires natural efficiency as a Medium Wave radiator.

                    Like men with red-flags walking in front of road locomotives the restriction is long obsolete. Superhet radios replaced regenerative types after the war and they are much less likely to couple power into an antenna no matter how gormless the operator. In addition, the Ferrite rods that replaced long wire antennas are grossly inefficient transmitters.

                    In any case you would either need an enormous antenna and/or be unhealthy close to a broadcaster to leech significant power from the system. Field strength reduces proportional to the cube of distance.

                    Dave

                    #391568
                    John Haine
                    Participant
                      @johnhaine32865
                      Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 17/01/2019 12:53:51:

                      Posted by Andrew Johnston on 16/01/2019 16:47:05:

                      The original T&Cs for my amateur radio licence, back in the 1970s, banned end-fed wire antennas longer than, I think, 75 feet. That was because in the early days of radio people near the long wave transmitters were extracting enough energy to power a light bulb or two.

                      Andrew

                      Pedant Alert!

                      …….. Field strength reduces proportional to the cube of distance.

                      Dave

                      Um, square of distance?

                      #391570
                      John Haine
                      Participant
                        @johnhaine32865

                        Actually, to be really pedantic, Friis' formula says that the received power is inversely proportional to the (frequency x distance) squared for the far field. If you mean near field then coupled power decreases as inverse 4th or 6th power depending on whether you couple to electric or magnetic field. According to Wikipedia.

                        #391583
                        Speedy Builder5
                        Participant
                          @speedybuilder5

                          I have my dad's radio licence from about 1920. It allowed him to receive spark transmitted morse code (admiralty Chatham) so long as he did not communicate the contents to anyone else. He went on to Receive 2LO and make home made radios. Things all changed when he finished his dockyard apprenticeship and started as a draughtsman at Short Brothers in Rochester.

                          #391597
                          ega
                          Participant
                            @ega
                            Posted by Speedy Builder5 on 17/01/2019 15:10:07:

                            …Things all changed when he finished his dockyard apprenticeship and started as a draughtsman at Short Brothers in Rochester.

                            I assume that the subject matter of his work at Shorts was rather different from that at the Dockyard. Was the move from choice or simply the end of his apprenticeship?

                            There are several period photos of the Shorts factory on the Britain from the Air website:

                            https://britainfromabove.org.uk/en/search?keywords=Short%20Brothers%20Rochester&country=england&year=all

                            #391603
                            SillyOldDuffer
                            Moderator
                              @sillyoldduffer
                              Posted by John Haine on 17/01/2019 13:47:15:

                              Actually, to be really pedantic, Friis' formula says that the received power is inversely proportional to the (frequency x distance) squared for the far field. If you mean near field then coupled power decreases as inverse 4th or 6th power depending on whether you couple to electric or magnetic field. According to Wikipedia.

                              Doh, I meant far field, thought square and typed cube. Story of my life!

                              The gods punish pendants by making them wrong. Always…

                              sad

                              Dave

                              #391612
                              Meunier
                              Participant
                                @meunier
                                Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 17/01/2019 18:10:26:

                                The gods punish pendants by making them wrong. Always…

                                sad

                                Dave

                                I hereby sentence you to be suspended until you acknowledge your errors, pedantically, ad infinitum.
                                DaveD

                                #391632
                                Speedy Builder5
                                Participant
                                  @speedybuilder5

                                  Ega, Yes, when Dad finished his 7 year apprenticeship, there wasn't a job for him in the dockyard. He bluffed his way into Shorts drawing office on the strength of what he had done at Technical School. The rest is history, but always in aviation finishing up at BAC Weybridge above Barnes Wallaces office.

                                  Those photos for the Rochester works looks like them assembling / testing on the grassy slopes of the river. Oddly enough, when we got married, we moved to Cotton End, Bedfordshire, next to Shortstown – Shorts Airship design and manufacturing site and Cardington Hangar fame etc etc.
                                  BobH

                                Viewing 15 posts - 26 through 40 (of 40 total)
                                • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                                Advert

                                Latest Replies

                                Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                                Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                                View full reply list.

                                Advert

                                Newsletter Sign-up