Posted by Andrew Johnston on 16/01/2019 16:47:05:
The original T&Cs for my amateur radio licence, back in the 1970s, banned end-fed wire antennas longer than, I think, 75 feet. That was because in the early days of radio people near the long wave transmitters were extracting enough energy to power a light bulb or two.
Andrew
Pedant Alert!
I think Andrew misremembers a condition from the old Broadcast Radio Licence. Before TV went big you had to have a Wireless Licence to listen legally to a radio in the UK. Later (about 1970?) this difficult to enforce requirement was dropped. Since then BBC services are funded from the TV licence money and commercial services by advertising (usually).
The 75 foot limit dates to before the War when Regenerative receivers where common. A home aerial would typically be a wire strung from the chimney to a pole at the end of the garden. Regenerative receivers require the operator to achieve selectivity by adjusting an RF amplifier and tuning coil close to oscillation. (It has the effect of improving Q)
Large numbers of people would get this wrong and would have their sets oscillating because real men never read instructions or care about their neighbours! Coupled direct into an end-fed antenna in the garden, the resulting howl could travel several miles. Insisting receive antennas were less than 75 foot long much reduced the nuisance by restricting the wires natural efficiency as a Medium Wave radiator.
Like men with red-flags walking in front of road locomotives the restriction is long obsolete. Superhet radios replaced regenerative types after the war and they are much less likely to couple power into an antenna no matter how gormless the operator. In addition, the Ferrite rods that replaced long wire antennas are grossly inefficient transmitters.
In any case you would either need an enormous antenna and/or be unhealthy close to a broadcaster to leech significant power from the system. Field strength reduces proportional to the cube of distance.
Dave