To me this is about cost vs reliability.
If saving money has priority, then buy hobby level unbranded products. I don’t spend money on tools for peace of mind reasons, or as an investment. One way hobby products keep cost down is by cutting inspections, which means that some percentage will come out of the factory in poor condition. The customer is the final inspector, so it’s important to check immediately. When a new product is found wanting, contact the supplier, who, for reputational and legal reasons, should replace or refund.
If reliability has priority, and money is no object, then buy industrial. Judging by price and who sells them the Omega and Bison chucks identified by Taf are both low-end industrial.
I think Omega are a rebrand operation. Doesn’t worry me much because outsourcing is extremely common. Bison, do, or did, manufacture their own stuff. As far as I know Bison are a ‘good make’, and Omega are careful about what they sell.
I usually buy mid-range tools from UK based suppliers. Though I wouldn’t want to overstate it, internet purchases, especially from abroad, are risky for several reasons and, if it goes wrong, expect some bovver. Ebay, Amazon and PayPal all help manage the financial risk. I only go upmarket when I have a specific need, and when doing so I’m careful not to waste money polishing a turd! The run-out of my Chinese Mill is determined by its spindle, bearings, and rigidity. There’s no point in me fitting a sooper-dooper collet chuck to it!
Taf is different to me. His Chester improvements make it more likely fitting a well-made chuck will pay off. As the Omega and Bison are less than £70, why not? BUT! if Taf’s done a really good job, low-end industrial might not be ‘good enough’.
🙂
Dave