john – I believe you are talking of putting a radial load into a drill chuck, which agreed, is unwise in the general run of things.
That’s rather different from putting an axial load from any form of cutter into a drill chuck which was designed to carry axial loads.
Are you sure that you don’t have the signs in the axial loads the wrong way round, at least in steel. You need to apply a thrust to drive a drill bit or slot drill. (about 80lbs force to drive a sharp 1/4 bit).
As for supported unsupported – well not necessarily – depends on the strength of the chuck. Granted the forces in the jaws are not constant of course, but no one said they were – they are in fact cycling – reaching a maximum as the load is being taken on one jaw, and then being shared between two – in proprtion to the angular difference. (I have no doubt that we can can work out our sines and cosines as well as the next man). But that doesn’t mean that the grip on the tool MUST be reduced below an unacceptable minimum.
As for walking out – you don’t feel that might be more a phenomenon of worn chucks jaws of any sort which allow axial moment – rather than a cycling of forces in the jaws of a chuck in good condition? Actually you can get walking out in chucks which wholly support the tool – such as ER32 collets – it they are not tight enough.
And no – milling cutters don’t always generate radial forces. Not on plunging cuts.
And there are plenty of pretty flat tipped drills too – many gun drills for a start, and sheet metal drills – or drills ground for drilling into sheet.
So again – its not about milling or drilling – its about the direction of the forces being generated. And to some degree the magnitude of those forces vis a vis the strength and rigidity of the set up as a whole.
Edited By meyrick griffith-jones on 26/09/2009 15:32:51