It was my original intent to avoid a long drawn out explanation as to the “where, what & why” but based on the various postings, it seems I’ll have to explain things in greater detail…
I deliberately bought the Proxxon stuff because it’s readily available here within Australia, unlike Sherline stuff.
Chinese made Sieg stuff is also readily available & far cheaper but the internet is littered with various “problems” associated with these & other similar made brands…
I wanted to “make my own projects” out of the box rather than buy equipment for IT to become the project…
My skillsets are limited & I want to learn based on what I’ve done wrong (too fast speed or feed) rather than find out later it’s ALL been down to issues buying some cheap Chinese made equipment…my current life expectancy is too short.
And for the most part my choice of going with the Proxxon has proven itself to be worthwhile, as the various parts I make are within tolerance & my skills are getting better at doing it.
As part of that “planned” purchase, both my Lathe & Mill weigh under 20Kg each & can easily be lifted on or off a kitchen bench top…this being important as a pending “downsize” in home is happening within a few years.
As both the Lathe & Mill have the option of being combined together to become a “Machine Centre”, THAT was another key element for choosing these items…I have options designed to “work together” if needed.
Hopefully the above now sets the out the “where, what & why” for my original question about the UT 400…
The fact is I already have the Proxxon Rotary Table version UT 250 which is designed to accept the PD 250/E Lathe Chucks, Faceplate & Collet Holder, although it’s not been designed to accept any Dividing Plates
I also have the “now obsoleted” Proxxon TA 250 Dividing Attachment which Graham has already mentioned & has now designed his Emco 40:1 Worm Drive to suit.
Naively when I’d seen Graham’s modified Emco Dividing Attachment & just assumed it was similar to that of the existing Proxxon UT 400 Universal Dividing Head (old video lists it as UT 360)
My original plan was to do away with my existing two units & consolidate them by getting the UT 400 Universal Dividing Head as their ONE replacement…but like all “grand plans” there was a “slight problem”.
I’m sure many on the Forum posses the knowledge & ability to simply modify my Rotary Table to accept a set of Dividing Plates…unfortunately I don’t currently have that same skillset.
As the Proxxon stuff is designed to fit & utilise other components within its own range, my first plan was to establish “if” the UT 400 Universal Dividing Head was any good & accurate? (hence my original post)
However the UT 400 is designed for the larger Lathe PD 400 Chucks & Faceplate & “those” are dimensionally too large for the FF 230 Mill…the UT 400 WILL fit but doesn’t accept my smaller Chucks.
Again I’m sure there’s many who posses the insights & skillsets to simply modify or adapt the UT 400 to accept my smaller Chucks…but I’m currently not one of them.
I was reminded of that “slight problem” by one of Graham’s earlier posts where he mentions about the limitation of the FF 230 Mill “Y” axis depth & risk of mounted items hitting the Mill Column…
This effectively eliminated any benefits & the whole idea for getting the UT 400, which has now been abandoned.
Hopefully this helps explain things & the restraints I’m working within.
regards Colin