Taking a clutch apart to replace the plate is a fair amount of work, hence expensive, plus VAT. Thus it makes sense to replace a time-worn flywheel when a new clutch plate is needed because the labour cost is halved compared with doing the flywheel and plate separately.
A couple of posts suggest the Dual Mass Flywheel works by absorbing energy. Not so. Rather it stores energy such that shocks are spread over time, smoothing sharp hammer blows into smoother pushes that are much less likely to damage the engine and drive train.
As a general rule replacing a DMF with a solid flywheel isn’t smart. Although solid flywheels also reduce shocks, they’re not as effective, causing more hammering. The exception is performance driving, where it’s accepted that the car will be damaged. Whilst expensive Formula 1 engines are happily rebuilt by their owners after every race, I choose to minimise maintenance costs by driving within my car’s ordinary design envelope. Though I do dream of removing the silencer and painting on a Starsky and Hutch go-faster stripe!
Dave