Siddeley: Connectors from readout difficult to fit to scales and insecure.
There are a type of scales in the same range of values not suffering from this problem because the display is remote and the cable has only one connetor to connect to the display. I think they are called iGaging. See please ***LINK*** .
You can see here ***LINK*** the cable coming out beneath of the "cursor" box so the oil doesn't flow in by gravity.
The old-style connectors were useless. I just soldered teh wires in place and filled the hole with hot melt data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/472df/472dfdac6477296c3cc2f7509cad30f058103056" alt=""
Siddeley: Scales sometimes 'froze' and wouldn't start working again until the battery was removed and replaced
Never happened to me with these scales.
I find that when remote powered they are very sensitive to glitches on the power lines especially on power up. I keep meaning to fit 10uf capacitors in the battery compartments.
Siddeley: Update rate on the scales was very slow, it was neccessary to crank the wheels on the machine in a tortoise like fashion to avoid overshooting.
Never happened to me with these scales.
There is a 'fast' option that can only be activated remotely on most scales. This updates about 10-20 times a second – I find it easier to use normal speed and go gently!
Siddeley: The 'off' button on the scales was really a 'standby' button and the battery was still being drained.
Not verified. So, no opinion.
This is so the scales do not 'forget' their setting when switched off. Think of it as a blessing! Cells should last a year or more unless thetemperature gets close to zero (when the discharge rate soars).
Siddeley: General 'glitching' from display and from scales – blank readouts, refusal to zero.
Never happened to me with these scales.
Probably transients on the cables again – make sure they are routed away from motor/control box/switches/fluorescent lights.
Neil