I fold my magazine in half so it becomes irrelvant whether the spine is at the top or the bottom.
I'm drawing some quite complicated drwawings (loco frames) and discovered I needed three drawings to cover all the dimensions without confusion. The alternative is blowing up to full size, but then it takes just as much paper and you can't see the full picture at once!
It is quite stressful working out the best ways to dimension objects; I have decided to leave off things like the radii of square holes with rounded corners, as in 99% of cases the radius used will be that of the cutter or file used to finish the job. Technically, of course, some would like to see these as toleranced dimensions.
I dimensioned the holes from a datum point (bottom left), except for the ones for the horn rivets, as its more important these align with the cut outs for the horns. In other words I tried to reference each dimension from the point where I would measure it in practice: I think this should make sense and minimise actual errors.
I'm always amazed at how few dimensions seem to be used on older drawings in ME yet there always seems to be sufficient detail to make the things!
Neil