Putting things in proportion a bit, although it is off-topic, the bad experiences some have had with clubs should not be regarded as typical of all model-engineering societies, neither should unwelcoming attitudes by die-hards be seen as unique to our hobby.
I have seen it elsewhere, and very often it comes down to just a tiny clique of long-standing (or armchair-weighting) characters who have become very proprietorial to organisations or facilities they had put considerable effort into building many years previously. So they fear new people and ideas that might change the armchairs.
I also knew of three (one since deceased) people – members of my own club – who were deterred from helping it in future thanks only to one, just one, person being so hurtfully sarcastic to them on just one occasion they decided that was enough and they took no further part in its activities.
I have also known elsewhere, outside of model-engineering, a lot of visitors to that club’s facilities being treated coldly by a clique of only about three out of well over 200 members. It gave the club a bad name for a while.
Now, I propose such childish treatment of newcomers or visitors is probably very much a minority problem. Even so, no matter how friendly a bunch of chaps and chappesses personally, any club must be careful not to appear to newcomers to be stuck on just one or two aspects of its interest.
In the end, perhaps what inspires anyone to make things from metals might not be the publications, but the societies of people already making things. Not tracks or workshops or club-rooms; but people.
If society members don’t entice people into the hobby, the future of that, never mind its magazines, is down to the consequently dwindling number of potential readers. Not vice-versa.