Posted by Peter G. Shaw on 04/08/2018 13:51:24:
I haven't bothered with the digitals because for one thing any reading is subject to plus or minus one digit. Which means that, eg, 10.00mm could be measured as 9.99 or 10.01mm. Hardly accurate in my view!
…
As you guess, I'm not a fan of digital measuring devices!
Peter G. Shaw
One good thing about the ± 1 digit issue is the reminder that the instrument has limitations.
Most digital calipers are only accurate to ±0.02mm – worse than the precision of the display. No point in worrying about the display being out by ±0.01mm when the caliper itself isn't that good.
An ordinary analogue caliper isn't mechanically any more accurate than it's digital cousin and it may be much worse. But the most serious weakness of analogue instruments is that they are easily misread. They depend entirely on good eye-sight and correct interpretation of the display. Parallax, misreading dial markings, and misplacing vernier scale alignments are all common mistakes. The best of digital displays is that they are much harder to misread.
For many applications a digital display is better than an analogue, but not all. Numeric displays aren't good at indicating rate of change. On a lathe, the rpm counter should be digital because you want to set a steady value. On a tyre pressure gauge, I prefer an analogue dial because needle movements are informative about leaks. As you say, horses for courses.
Dave
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 04/08/2018 21:04:19