Andrew,
I did think my calculated values were a bit out when I wrote it, but considering the time, which I hadn't realised it was, I just couldn't be bothered to check it. So thanks for the correct values.
The point I was trying to make is that digital is not necessarily the best and that an analogue meter despite its perceived lack of accuracy, is often more than plenty good enough.
I haven't done any serious electronic work for a considerable number of years now, but a bit like Dave/SOD, I do indeed have a pair of analogue meters, and a digital meter. I don't have a portable digital 'scope, but I do have a standard analogue twin channel, single timebase 'scope, and, if I can ever be bothered to mend it, a Tectronic dual channel, dual timebase 'scope. So I have more than enough test equipment available If I need them. Which I don't.
My final comment is that digital is not the be-all and end-all it's often cracked up to be.
Cheers,
Peter G. Shaw