How could someone bend the needle ??
I doubt if even I could do that !
Must have jammed the unit in something solid.
Which begs the question, ‘what other damage has been done?‘ As an extreme force must have been applied, quite likely the delicate precision gears and bearings are bent too, making the instrument sticky and inaccurate, and these are a much more difficult repair,
Expensive instruments are often manufactured with maintenance in mind, coming apart sensibly and with spares available, at least when the device was being sold new.
There are many ways manufacturing costs can be reduced by not supporting maintenance: welds, rivets and one-way press-fits rather than screws; glue rather than O-rings; anything that speeds production, etc etc. The product is cheaper, likely performs as well as more expensive equivalents out of the box initially, but can’t be kept spot-on by maintenance, and is difficult or impossible to fix when it goes wrong.
For infrequent work, or if the item is likely to be dropped or stolen, the cheap version is often more economic. When a cheap instrument fails, replace it. How long they last depends on how often and how hard they are worked, plus how tolerant the operator is of gradually increasing malfunction. Hobbyists can be very tolerant, for example happily using an ancient name brand-dial bought fourth hand off ebay, blissfully unaware the poor old thing hasn’t performed to spec since 1978! Doesn’t matter provided it gets the job done.
I can’t think of a good reason for repairing a cheap DTI that’s difficult to get into. More trouble than it’s worth, unless of course, repairing things is your hobby, or maybe doing post mortems! How designers approach assembly vs maintenance is interesting though.
Personally I think the trend towards making everything replaceable rather than fixable is a bad thing. Although it makes ownership cheaper today, it’s very wasteful, and impossible to sustain in the long run. Don’t worry, we will all be long dead before it fails.
Dave