Posted by Tim Stevens on 07/08/2023 10:46:16:
SoD says: Art can't be quantified and checked against a specification. That means everybody's opinion of it is of equal value.
I suggest that this depends on how you define ‘value’. In the art trade, the value of an item is what someone will pay for it, so the decisions always depend solely on the views of the well-off. And clearly, the majority – who tend to have little or no spare cash – count for nothing.
Of course, the value of an item can be judged in other ways, but it seems to me that SoD is – just this once – wide of the mark.
Regards – Tim
Well, I type in a sentence that seems completely clear to me and Tim proves it's not!
It was the value of different opinions on art I meant rather than the value of art itself. For example, I hate jazz. In my opinion It's elitist, irritating, self-indulgent, ill disciplined and pointless. Jazz is a waste of my time and the musicians technical and aesthetic skills.
A friend loves jazz. He says improvisation creates pure music freed from stultifying convention, and is the human spirit unshackled. My friend considers jazz 'powerful', which I say is rubbish because power is measured in Watts not Armstrongs per Hour.
My point is that neither of us is right or wrong about the value of Jazz because it can't be quantified, it's subjective. Since there's nothing to measure, my friend's opinion of Jazz is just as good as mine. The danger is that we are fanatics and prepared to force our ideas on others.
Engineering value works because it can be measured. Thus a tool made in 1975 is great, whilst its makers hair-style, moustaches, flared trousers, platform shoes, and loud shirts have all proved ridiculous! Anyone prepared to share photos of themselves from 'the decade that style forgot'? Not me!
Dave