I wonder if our experts could help me on the best ways to tackle this. I do have a plan, but I’m wondering if it’s realistic.
Background: I want to cut a lozenge shaped hole in a steel disc. I have two vintage Austin Seven axle tubes. Many of you will be familiar with the set up. The axle is in three parts (four if we’re pedantic). The central case for the differential, two side tubes for the axle shafts, and a torque tube at the front. The problem is, someone has cut the brake back plates off my tubes(!) and left a lozenge shaped end on which they intended to fit some sort of hydraulic brake arrangement or; perhaps, the very late Austin Seven Girling mechanical set up. (Photo one) I don’t want any of this, but I don’t want to discard the tubes either; rather to return them to their original vintage form. Photo two)
Thus, I need a new back plate (144mm diameter) with a big hole in the middle to weld onto what’s left at the tube end.
The complication with the hole, as you can see, is it needs a radius top and bottom to fit onto the tube and I’m not sure if my thinking on this is sound.
I thought – establish the radius of an imaginery full circle (51.5mm actually)
whose circumference at its outer extremity would be about15mm inside the circumference of the back plate.(15mm is the distance from the radius on the hole to the edge of the back plate. This is not a critical distance but it needs to accommodate a hole for the brake actuating cam shaft and the fixed pivot for the brake shoes). Given we know the lengths of the straight sides of the hole (12 cm) and the distance they are apart (width of the hole) scribed vertical lines should touch the cicumferance of the imaginary circle,at a point that would create the correct radius on the hole. Is that correct?
But how do you make the hole?. I thought to secure the back plate on a rotary table, and with an end mill/slot drill in my milling machine, off-set the spindle to the radius of the aforesaid imaginary circle measured from the centre of the
back plate. Turning the table through the requisite number of degrees against the mill should then cut the radius shouldn’t it? The cutter could then clear the waste by moving down both sides on the mill’s Y axis? But if this is viable – what would be the correct/best type of mill?
Many thanks in advance and for your patience. Martyn
—