Colour imaging in very low light

[Michael GilliganParticipant @michaelgilligan61133]

The headline, predictably enough, exaggerates somewhat …

**LINK**

https://petapixel.com/2021/12/07/canon-develops-a-sensor-that-can-shoot-full-color-photos-in-the-dark/

… but if it’s compatible with borescope/endoscope optics this could be very useful.

MichaelG.

[Michael GilliganParticipant @michaelgilligan61133]

Consider the possibilities ?

[John HaineParticipant @johnhaine32865]

Quote:

"Nikkei adds that the SPAD sensor has an additional feature that allows it to measure the distance to an object from the time it takes for the reflected light to return to it, meaning it can understand space in three dimensions. As a result, it is possible that this sensor could be used on devices that currently leverage LiDAR."

Er, that is Lidar isn't it?

[Michael GilliganParticipant @michaelgilligan61133]

Posted by John Haine on 11/12/2021 10:37:37:

Quote:

"Nikkei adds that the SPAD sensor has an additional feature that allows it to measure the distance to an object from the time it takes for the reflected light to return to it, meaning it can understand space in three dimensions. As a result, it is possible that this sensor could be used on devices that currently leverage LiDAR."

Er, that is Lidar isn't it?

.

I suppose it depends upon how you choose to interpret that acronym : **LINK**

What is lidar?

MichaelG.

[Neil WyattModerator @neilwyatt]

Curious.

Many standard CMOS sensors now have a quantum efficiency of 90%.

I'm not entirely sure why there would be a need to chip away at that final 10%.

Perhaps the 'avalanche' amplification ends up being lower noise than conventional amplification?

Even a pretty old DSLR is quite good at taking photos when barely anything is visible… I think this was with a Canon 10D. The circle is around andromeda.

Neil

[Clive FosterParticipant @clivefoster55965]

Neil

Its not so much the quantum efficiency per se more the ability to get enough electrons out in one lump not to be lost in the noise. SPAD systems have to reject most of the incoming light to function at all.

These days we take transfer efficiency pretty much for granted but the first CCD device I played at "imaging" with was a 100 element linear array made by GEC Hirst Research Centre with aluminium surface electrodes (opaque!) and a transfer efficiency of 99.9 % or so on a good day. With only about 10 or 15 % of the silicon surface exposed to incoming light and a spectacular image brightness slope due to transfer losses getting anything resembling an image out was challenging. Actaully demonstrating that it could be used for something was a minor miracle.

Tracking the rapid changes of CCD development as the devices went from lab curiosity to useful to who needs a plumbicon over less than a decade was interesting. In comparison CMOS sensors were decent from the get-go.

Single photon range finding with avalanche detectors is interesting but much more involved than casual descriptions suggest. I spent several years playing with the concept and demonstrating what could be done with affordable equipment. Back then the SPAD array was the holy grail device. I never saw one but it was always pretty clear that most of the folk wittering on about how wonderful they would be had no experience of actually using SPAD detectors in anything approaching imaging or range finding. In particular range gating is a major issue as is saturation. Proposals to use such devices as part of self driving car sensor suits worry me to the extent that if one comes down my street I'm going to be getting just as far away as I can.

Clive

[Michael GilliganParticipant @michaelgilligan61133]

Digressing somewhat … I was intrigued to see a much better rendition of this : https://youtu.be/C_q307ltuY4

[Yuri Gagarin] in the TV programme : Chasing the Moon, episode 1

Available on iPlayer for a few more days.

Pixel-peepers might like to view it.

MichaelG.

.

.

Edited By Michael Gilligan on 13/12/2021 19:33:42

[Author]

Posts