Hi Leanne ,
a few years ago my first attempt at parting off on my 12 year old CL300M was a little exciting !
small inexpensive lathes like the CL300M are made with the minimum of cast iron needed
the bed is more flexible than heavier (and more expensive) machines of the same capacity
the resulting unwanted movement of the tools, when combined with the effect of ill fitting gibs
inadequate spindle bearings makes parting off a problem
on my first attempt , the tool deflected downwards as the work piece climbed onto the top of the parting off tool
that's was with the parting off tool as close as I dare to the chuck and the minimum unsupported length
the main problem being the original gibs , both under size and bent out of shape – new gibs fixed the problem
the chuck proved to be OK and importantly the jaws undamaged
but some play and roughness was detected in the spindle bearing – some thing that I would of left until later , if I had not needed to replace the plastic double gear on the main spindle ( part of the gear split after the parting tool jammed for the 4 or 5 time)
the parting off tools that are supplied with the lathe appear to be too wide
when I reground the tool , I made it 2 mm wide instead of 3 mm
the thinner tool reduces the bending forces on the lathe and reduces the load on the motor
one mode still on my to do list , that you may want to look at is the carriage lock :–
**LINK**
John
Edited By john swift 1 on 11/07/2012 23:44:51