Posted by Andy Carlson on 27/05/2022 19:00:46:
Out of interest… how does continuous cast iron round bar compare to a more traditional casting?
My gut feel is that it is less badly behaved – I think that sand is ruled out for example. Chilling – maybe better controlled? Carbides.. no idea.
.
I have worked for 6 years to learn how to make my own iron castings, and while I am no iron "expert" by any stretch, I have learned a few things about iron, and how to get consistent and machinable gray iron castings.
I use scrap iron motor end bells, and they are consistently good quality material that are not too difficult to break up into smaller pieces.
My first iron castings were about 1" thick, and they machined easily without any additive.
I then tried some thin castings, perhaps 1/2" and thinner, and succeeded in making tool steel, which would dull any sawblade, and was totally unmachinable.
I discovered ferosilicon, and so now I use a slight amount of it in each melt, and this prevents the "chills" in my thin pieces. The "chills" are hard spots in the casting that are created when the metal solidifies before the graphite flakes can be established in the metal.
My first iron casting used Petrobond, which is an oil-based sand, and while iron can be cast in Petrobond, my sand erroded badly at iron temperatures, and so I had some sand inclusions, which luckily I was able to repair.
I discovered "resin-bound" sand, and it is a 3-part material, with resin, hardener, and catalyst.
Resin-bound sand is designed to work well with iron and steel castings, and I have never had any further mold problems using resin-bound sand; ie: no voids, no inclusions, no defects of any kind.
The continuous cast gray iron bars machine beautifully, but in a blind test, I don't think I would be able to distinguish my castings from gray bar, as far as machining or quality.
One more trick that seems to help get consistent iron castings is to let the casting remain in the sand mold overnight, to cool slowly. Not absolutely necessary, but it seems to help make a very machinable iron casting.
You definitely don't want to pull a hot iron casting out of that sand and quench it in water; that would be asking for trouble.
Edit: Any more than a slight amount of ferrosilicon (75% grade) will cause excessive shrinkage and will cause hot tears in the castings.
Edit02: Avoiding slag inclusions in castings is a matter of using the proper gate and runner configuration.
The runners should deadend into a spin trap that is open to the top of the mold, and the gates should be on the top of the runner, so that the gates skim the slag off as the iron enters the mold.
Voids are often caused by poor sprue and runner layouts and sizes. I try to actually rest the lip of the crucible on the top of the mold, to prevent any waterfall effect. The sprue should fill quickly, and remain full throughout the entire pour, so as not to aspirate air. The runners terminating in a spin traps give the initial flow of metal and any entrained air/sand/slag a place to escape, without entering the mold cavity.
The velocity of the molten metal should be controlled by the gates, not the sprue. The mold cavity should be filled as fast as possible without causing turbulence in the metal. High velocity in the metal stream causes many if not perhaps most problems in iron castings.
Edited By PatJ on 27/05/2022 23:04:40