Posted by Muzzer on 25/06/2014 05:49:03:
The Adaptive Clearing technique used in CAM applications like Mastercam, Solidcam, HSMworks etc isn't ensuring a constant chip thickness at all, it is targeting a more constant tool load which is quite different. If you haven't grasped the difference, there's a great introduction to the basics on the Solidcam website (possibly even a bit laboured) although the same principles seem to be used in the other applications, give or take.
I'm no expert on the matter but it looks as if the "Adaptive Clearing" concept was conceived by a couple of Brits (blog here). The approach sounds pretty simple on the face of it but once you start to dive it it becomes clear this is a pretty involved matter. When you cut into a corner with an end mill using "simple offset" contours, you will find that the cutting surface suddenly wants to extend to perhaps 1/2 of the circumference or more, depending on the stepover. This could be a problem, yet if you reduce the overall speeds and feeds for the whole operation just to make this one situation safe, you end up taking longer than necessary for the rest of the machining. With Adaptive Clearing, the solution is to continuously vary the stepover and feed rate (and spindle speed) to even out the tool loading.
If you have Solidworks, the HSMXpress add-on is free for 2.5D use and includes this functionality. I'm looking forward to trying it out for myself soon. There are a lot more features in these CAM applications than just Adaptive Clearing of course and I am sure there are many patents and PhDs still to be written in the field! Fascinating stuff.
Murray
Murray it does both, some count chip thinning as the more dangerous of the two ,we certainly did,as if you have a square block it can sit there all day going round and round and round just slicing material off if you dont have a good stock definition say a triangle pocket with round corners the software can still make a hell of a mess of it
I dont need to read up on Solidcam as the research establishment i worked at is one of the places that actually developed the core that is sold to other cam companies (i do like to ask dumb questions of the HSM works guys though as they simply have adaptive and that is all) ,you might note i wrote constant tool engagment, with this comes constant chip load you would never purposefully say stepover 2mm and 1mm in the same cut for example though this could happen due to geometry of the cam part and what ha been removed from the stock , in the background the chip thinning is also being monitored on entry exit and around corners and where a previous cut has left a situation where it might be 2mm in one place and 1mm further down where it could exceed the limitations you notice its arcing spline like toolpaths with differing stepovers ,
also because its monitoring chip thinning there is no speed reduction in or out of corners book speed might say 400mm a min feed a controller also might slow this using g codes when it sees a G02 or G03 but when your watching a cutter doing 5 times this feed in and accelerating out because its adjusted for loads and thinning you start to see the benefits in cycle time
Dont get me wrong i can test the same cutter with 15mm doc 5mm woc in en24t and it will cut the job but i need hp and torque with adaptive and constant chip load/thickness i need less horsepower and torque as the cut is still full depth but as its taking a smaller bite of the cherry with much faster feeds theres a reduction in cycle but no increase in the loads the cutter sees, hence much smaller machines can be as productive as big machines that need to hog material
Edited By mike mcdermid on 04/07/2014 11:03:05
Edited By mike mcdermid on 04/07/2014 11:04:44
Edited By mike mcdermid on 04/07/2014 11:06:17