Today's visit to the Eye Clinic brought the not-unexpected advice that I should have both lenses replaced by those new-fangled synthetic ones. **LINK**
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cataract_surgery
So far, so good … BUT can anyone comment, please, on the pros & cons of chosing a short-sighted or a long-sighted solution?
I am naturally short-sighted, but the Surgeon presumed that I would prefer to be 'made' long-sighted, and wear glasses for all close work … A chat with my own Optician then raised some doubt in my mind: It may actually be preferable to choose short-sightedness, and continue to wear glasses for driving & walking about.
What I don't know, is the depth-of-field provided by these synthetic lenses; and therefore how much changing between pairs of glasses may be needed with each option.
N.B. … I don't like the idea of bi-focals or vari-focals.
Grateful for any advice from those with actual experience, or professional expertise.
MichaelG.
.
P.S. This is a very seroius matter for me, so could we please keep the witty remarks and the hypothesising to a minimum … Thanks.