There is some misinformation posted above, including the allegation in the original post that the table is incomplete.
Most importantly, and this applies to both imperial and metric lathes, any pitch that is a factor of the leadscrew pitch does not need an indicator at all. You can drop the halfnuts in anywhere they engage and the threads will be synchronised.
For a 3mm pitch leadscrew, this will be 0.25mm, 0.5mm, 0.75mm, 1mm, 1.5mm, 3mm.
(For an 8tpi leadscrew, this would be 8tpi, 16, tpi, 24tpi, etc.)
Thus any row of the table above that fits the above metric pitches should be blank to signify 'thread dial not needed'.
Unfortunately, the table itself is not consistent in its use of blank lines. For a 5.5mm or 11mm pitch, you need a gear that has a factor of 11 in its tooth count (e.g. 22). No such gear is available so for those two pitches, the only option is keeping the halfnuts engaged and full reversal.
The above is just a flavour of the problems with the table. At this point we can give you a fish by providing a correct table or we can teach you to fish so you can draw up the table yourself not only for this machine but for any machine that you will ever own.
The model engineering equivalent of 'Teach yourself to fish' is Martin Cleeve's 'Screwcutting in the lathe'. You can fast-track your angling education and read just one chapter of the whole book: the part sub-headed 'problems of repeat pickup. In that section, he discusses 'minimum synchronisation distance'. Understand that concept and you will understand the table above, where it is correct, where it is incorrect and where it is incomplete.
There are at least two other, newer screwcutting books but neither of them deal with this issue. Cleeve is the only place you will find enlightenment.