Posted by Clive B 1 on 23/02/2020 23:10:23:
…
The only thing is I don't know whether it would need to be 2.5mm or would 1.5mm cable be ok I'm not sure because there is the motor load to consider??
…
I was just thinking it might be better than having a 3 core cable and then two twin core cables all cable tied together going into the DOL Starter. Any ideas on that one??
Thanks
Clive
As the current carrying capacity of 1.5mm wire is nearly 20A, it will do.
I'd say going to the trouble of sourcing a short length of 5 core cable is more trouble than it's worth. Appropriate for long runs where there's a need to clearly identify the cores, but Over The Top in this application. (Of course no harm in using multicore cable if you already have some.)
I'd just use a length of mains twin core and a length of mains three core held together with string or a length of spiral cable tidy (this example sold by Amazon). A manufactured item would likely use a wiring loom, ie 5 single core wires held neatly together with thin cord and routed to avoid hazards. Looms are usually made to size on a frame and fitted with terminators ready for assembly, but no reason not to make similar on the spot.
The most objectionable part of the circuit is the long wandering live cable connecting the safety interlock switches together. If it falls off, there will be a dangling shock hazard. You could reduce the risk by fixing the cable down firmly with clips, or even better by running inside a conduit. (Plastic conduit is used to protect mains cabling in homes.) A better answer is to operate the interlocks with low voltage. The interlocks would operate a contactor next to the control box, and the contactor would manage the mains. But as that involves more expense and complexity, I'd go with what you've proposed.
Health and Safety is about managing risk. You've spotted some risks with the original machine and are taking steps to reduce them, which is good! The proposed fix introduces some new electrical risks which need the same consideration. Basically earthing all external metal parts, and making sure adults, children, and animals can't touch a live wire, including the possibility that a live wire might vibrate loose, snag, or chafe. I think the last 3 risks are why the long run between interlock switches needs attention : I'd probably protect it with conduit or any other practical way of securing the wire safely. The end goal is to make the machine safer than before, not to meet the highest possible standards. (The way houses are wired would be unacceptable on a ship, because ship electricity involves mores risks. Wiring a home to nautical electrical standards is a waste of time and money because – for example – it's unlikely a home will ever be soaked in salt water, or have it's wiring storm tossed or shaken continuously by a massive Diesel. ) If the risks presented by this old machine are mitigated, that's good. No need to fit a fancy waistcoat.
Dave
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 24/02/2020 10:05:02