Burnerd chucks 4-jaw independent

Advert

Burnerd chucks 4-jaw independent

Home Forums Workshop Tools and Tooling Burnerd chucks 4-jaw independent

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #147163
    Adam Harris
    Participant
      @adamharris13683

      These two chucks appear identical and both in similarly good condition. I wonder if anyone knows what the difference in spec is and if one is better than the other and why? Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Adam

      Advert
      #17342
      Adam Harris
      Participant
        @adamharris13683

        A 1952 “Model 30M” vs their later “1548-16130 Iron Body”

        #147167
        Boiler Bri
        Participant
          @boilerbri

          Burnerd is at the top of the pile for quality, especially in production industry. Both will be as good on the quality front. For modelling where most things are made to fit each other by non skilled persons – i.e you and me and many others from all aspects of life. So in your judgement take the one that looks most appealing to you and will fit a suitable back plate for your machine

          hope this helps.

          Brian

          #147171
          Adam Harris
          Participant
            @adamharris13683

            Thanks Brian. I realise they are both perfectly suitable for me. I only enquire out of idle curiosity….Adam

            #147236
            Chris Gunn
            Participant
              @chrisgunn36534

              Adam I have a lathe with an old but good Burnerd chuck on it, but missing some jaws, jaws for this chuck are obsolete, so the chuck is not much use.

              If you can get spares for the newer variation, I would buy that.

              Chris Gunn

              #147256
              Adam Harris
              Participant
                @adamharris13683

                Chris, thanks for the practical advice. My enquiry is moreto do with my curiosity as to quality of manufacture and change in model number between old and newer….

                #147260
                Bob Youldon
                Participant
                  @bobyouldon45599

                  Hello Adam,

                  I think the difference in the chucks may relate to the maximum speed when in use, alternatives were steel and of course the Iron bodies; I think I still have the pamphlet that came with my chuck back in the seventies which may explain the differences, but I still think it relates to RPM when in use.

                  Regards,

                  Bob Youldon

                  #147261
                  NJH
                  Participant
                    @njh

                    Adam

                    You could try asking them :- LINK they may have an answer?

                    regards

                    Norman

                    #147262
                    Adam Harris
                    Participant
                      @adamharris13683

                      Hi Norman and Bob, I contacted Burnerd last week not really expecting a reply but this morning received an email from their David Stanley (Technical Sales) who states the following :"The chucks are Identical the 1548-16130 is a Pratt Burnerd number used for the Burnerd designed 34M chuck"! . So there we are. It might have helped members if I had correctly typed the 34M (rather than 30M) at the head of this thread but then again probably not! Adam

                    Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
                    • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                    Advert

                    Latest Replies

                    Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                    Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                    View full reply list.

                    Advert

                    Newsletter Sign-up