As you wish SOD, he uses bearings as he say they they offer a train with less friction and the bearings are according to him top quality stainless 2mm id x 5mm od. They are used all through the train with larger bearings on the winding shafts.
I was hoping for more detail and a rationale! Perhaps the friend chooses not to explain because it’s a trade-secret!
I guess the value of fitting bearings depends on the size of the clock? Due to their mass ball bearings have considerably more inertia than pivots running in a bush, and pivots are also low-friction, especially when run in a jewel. However, as bearings can take more load than pivots, I feel they make sense in large clocks that turning big hands and are powered by hefty weights. Bearings being easier to fit than pivots may be another benefit.
But I note watches and most domestic clocks have pivots rather than bearings. The reasons are not clear cut.
I’ve no doubt bearings will work in clocks, but it may be unwise to assume they are more effective than pivots, especially if the bearings are chosen carelessly. When comparing bearings, good to know what the moving part weighs and the coefficient of friction. Bearings are another aspect of clocks that gets more complicated the closer one looks. There must be a point at which the advantage switches from pivots to bearings. I’d like to know roughly where it is and shall have to do more digging.
Ta,
Dave
PS. My attempt at a precision clock eliminates stiction, friction, inertia, and wear by replacing the mechanical gear train with an electronic counter. Still difficult! Now I have new worries: sunlight on the sensor, electronics, computer issues, spikes on the mains, power cuts etc etc…