Bridgeport motors don't seem to do very well on static converters. I know of one that burnt out when used in Delta connection, i.e 240 volt, mode. Had mine on a 440 MotorRun static converter with step-up transformer. Worked reasonably well but I never had the nice warm "it's good" feeling. Adding a 5HP pilot motor to make it a "sort of" rotary converter improved the running considerably but it was never as good as a proper 3 phase input. VFD driven now, whole shop one from Drives Direct in my case, and its happy as Larry.
There are considerable electrical, magnetic and mechanical (inertial) shenanigans involved in making static and rotary converters work. The design details of the motors involved have considerable influence over what is going on. I suspect that the Bridgeport motor design is inherently unsuitable. Probably something along the lines as to why two speed and high efficiency "energy star" motors tend not to do well.
Not sure if anyone really understands this in detail. However there has been a considerable revival of analytical engineering interest in the Steinmetz connection, the underlying design of converters, of recent years to support application of induction generators in wind and other renewable energy applications. Common designs for relatively inexpensive three phase induction generators are essentially the same as a 3 phase motor. The big question in generator applications is how to maintain output balance when supplying unequal single phase loads. Which is the same, albeit reversed, problem as balancing a 3 phase motor on a single phase converter. The maths is the same either way. The sums are monster complicated too when you start getting serious.
Clive.
Edited By Clive Foster on 30/03/2017 11:51:16
Edited By Clive Foster on 30/03/2017 11:52:08