I think it has to do with the propulsion system birds are forced to use with all the musculature to work the wings anchored to the body below the wings.
One of the advantages of a low-wing aircraft is increased cabin space. Birds don’t carry passengers or cargo! Other reasons might include a bird’s requirement to do precision landings and hawk avoiding aerobatics. Both need a high-degree of slow-speed control.
A high wing on an aeroplane gives good lateral stability. Due to a lack of lateral stabilty very early (pre-Wright Brothers) flyers ended their flights by side slipping into the gound after about 30 yards or so. At altitude lack of lateral stability results in some very interest events. Wing dihedral also gives good lateral stability.
As for birds, I would suggest they approximate to a blended body (like what airliners should have been like for the last 30 years).
Interesting question, very complex and replies should run for sometime.
Birds evolved from four limbed dinosaurs. Four legged creatures typically have one at each corner for stability. Wings evolved from the front corners. It’s the same reason my arms are attached to my shoulders not my waist.
Look at the length of landing gear on some of the high wing aircraft. A wide body transport can get away with fuselage mounted wheels but a narrow body passenger aircraft does not want the extra weight of a long landing gear with the associated increase in stress on the mounting points due to leverage. If, on the other hand, you are mounting large propellers on a wing mounted engine then height is your friend and so a long landing gear becomes more acceptable. Like most engineering designs there are usually compromises somewhere so there are no hard and fast rules.
A high wing requires either very long and therefore stronger landing gear legs, or strengthened body framing to take the loads of body mounted landing gear. Both options add weight and complication.
If all loads can be taken by the wing structure it generally results in a more efficient design.
With a high wing and wing mounted landing gear, you have to accommodate the retracted landing gear somewhere within the wing, or within the engine nacelles, which adds complication and structural challenges. With a low wing, and wing mounted landing gear, the gear can retract sideways between the wing spars, and the wheels themselves can be accommodated in the bottom of the fuselage, so only the strut needs fitting into a channel in the wing.
High wings also make access to wing mounted engines that bit harder – you need step ladders or platforms to reach them – not necessarily easily available on busy ramps at busy airports – so something as simple as checking and topping up the engine oil is more difficult and takes longer. Airbus has underslung wing mounted engines which can easily be accessed for oil checks while standing on the ground, and also it is easier to inspect the engines during the walk-around.
Boeing have gone up a design cul-de-sac with their B737. The aircraft is set so low to the ground that they cannot accommodate bigger engines with larger front fans which are more efficient. So they first moved the engine accessory gearboxes from underneath to the side to give more ground clearance. Then on the ‘Max’ they moved the engines a long way forwards and up higher – almost in front of the wing – to give clearance, but this gave rise to controllability problems. Boeing then compounded this problem by a terrible half-arsed fix which relied on just a single AoA sensor. This single sensor was faulty on two Boeing 737 Max flights which then fatally crashed.
Coming back to the UK out of Florida one day in an Airbus A330; we had a landing gear problem: On the Airbus A330, the gear legs shorten as they are retracted, but on the left side the shortening mechanism sheered, so the leg did not shorten and was too long to fit the wheel bogey into the wheel well, (we discovered back on the ground). We followed the airborne drills which did not fix the problem, so we had to dump about 65 tonnes of fuel and then land again. The fault had slashed one of the tyres and damaged the wheel well doors.
We had to disembark the passengers, and after a few days of investigation by the engineers, we had to fly the aircraft back home empty, with the gear locked down. When we landed in Goose Bay to refuel, the broken shortening mechanism gave us more concerns, so after another few days of investigation, the engineers changed the entire left hand main landing gear before another crew flew the aircraft home !
Sorry, but I have no photos of this incident, which is a pity. Here is a photo of a (different) Airbus A330 during my walk-around at a different company, to show the general arrangement. A “low” wing is a relative term ! You can see a guy in a Hi-Viz jacket standing underneath the rear of the aircraft for scale. The wheel well doors under the fuselage are open here but are normally closed. The engineers must have been doing some checks.
Airbus A330. A beautifully designed aircraft and my favourite to fly.
Birds evolved from four limbed dinosaurs. Four legged creatures typically have one at each corner for stability. Wings evolved from the front corners. It’s the same reason my arms are attached to my shoulders not my waist.
I really like that description! It’s a shame I’ll never have the opportunity to repeat it in polite conversation. Thanks though. 😉