Gentlemen,
Thank you for your ideas and suggestions. I hadn’t expected this to stretch as far as it has.
That’s springs for you!
I thought it pertinent to comment upon each postings in turn. This will help to straighten my own thinking, and presumably will be of use to others who may be quietly following this thread or who pick it up later.
In his text about the clock, designer John Stevens explains the difficulties he experienced with this spring, but then he did begin from a different, perhaps more traditional point than I.
John,
I think you are right with regards to the hardness of the wire. It is very springy.
However, I have tried to avoid going through any heat treatment processes, even though annealing (stress relieving) may be required after winding. The original notes for this clock advocate that the (rectangular section 0.005″ x 0.02″) wire be wrapped around a brass or copper mandrel which has been carefully grooved to the requisite pitch. John Stevens then goes on to describe how to carry out fairly standard heat treatment while the wire is still wrapped around the mandrel. For me, this approach has to take a back seat, owing to my own very limited workshop circumstances.
I should point out that although this was my first attempt with this wire, it does take on a definite curl after winding, and I was able to determine the OD from the albeit poor results. There’s more about this aspect below.
Michael,
The engineering science is more great advice. Thank you for being so explicit.
Although I’m aware of the torsion component in the wire of helical springs when they are in service, I knew nothing of this (twisting) aspect during winding. It also explains why the weight I was using to apply tension to the wire was spinning slowly (after I had stopped winding). I thought that I’d perhaps caught it with my knee.
In addition to my previous interpretation of your notes, I envisage moving the pulley much further away from the mandrel. This should provide more freedom for the wire to rotate. For the same reason, I shall also use a weight with a minimal moment of inertia (eg. a small-diameter rod hung vertically), so that it will exert a lower level of inertia, offering more freedom for the wire to untwist on its own axis.
Roger,
Thanks for your posting. From my albeit poor results, I got a very curly, but screwed up bit of wire. I believe therefore that there was enough tension on the wire, and that the elastic limit was exceeded.
In bending, it is generally accepted that a beam is subjected to tensile stress on the convex side of the neutral axis. Sorry for the theory. I’m therefore more convinced that this part of the problem of uncoiling relates both to those in Michael’s notes about the wire being allowed to twist and, that the wire has already been heat treated. It is certainly very springy.
In Machinery’s Handbook, there’s a table of mandrel (arbor) sizes quoted for `music’ wire. The smallest diameter wire is the same as mine (0.008″), and the mandrel size for a 1/4″ OD spring is quoted at 0.129″. Unfortunately, the table does not extend to 3/8″ OD, the size I require. It is however, indicative of the amount of relaxation taking place. An extrapolation of the figures and my own mandrel size (guestimate) inserted, confirms that I am on the right track.
Gordon,
Thanks for your comments. Would your two brass washers be working in the same as the method used for controlling the thread tension on a sewing machine?
Ian,
I really appreciate your comments about winding springs. The method you describe appears to relate more to flat spirals. From my limited results and what Michael has mentioned, I could imagine getting myself and the springs into a real tangle if I wound two or more together.
Once I have succeeded in making a spring (whatever the pitch), I will rely upon the two ends of the spring being pulled apart by the clock’s own anchor points. These are just visible in my picture of the balance wheel.
I’ll now hang off doing anything else until you good people have had a chance to examine the above notes.
Regards,
Sam