Based on what the machine is for, Jake being a Concertina maker, I suggest a general purpose Mill is more suitable because they, and tooling, will do the job and more without breaking the bank or getting into the complexities of buying a second-hand machine that might need remedial work.
Jig borer performance isn’t needed, and I’d be very surprised to find Concertinas are made more accurately than a Far Eastern hobby mill can do, and hobby accessories are widely available and inexpensive.
A BCA Jig Borer is an object of desire, but don’t let that cloud your judgement if money is short, and you don’t need one. A jig borer is an expensive precision tool, designed to deliver high-accuracy within a narrow operating space. In some ways they excel, in others restricted. Great if what arrives does what’s needed in your workshop, but otherwise potentially painful! My guess is a BCA is big enough to do concertinas, but I wouldn’t buy one without double checking.
Jig boring accuracy was achieved by the maker fitting the best of everything, which makes spares and collets etc eye-wateringly expensive, even if they can be found. Don’t assume that because second-hand high-end manual machines tools are affordable, that so will be the spares! Au contraire, they are likely to be full-price, or even more due to premium rarity value.
I suggest the negative comments made by a couple of posters about their BCA experiences are well worth reading carefully. Do they ring any bells with Jake? Though jig borers have been widely used by hobbyists as milling machines, and are much loved, they weren’t designed for general purpose milling. In contrast, hobby mills have greater versatility, admittedly with inferior accuracy. But it would be a funny old world if a hobby mill out-performed an expensive industrial jig-borer!
My dream-car is a bright red Ferrari SP1. But as I only visit mother, Tescos and the tip, it made much more sense to buy a basic eco-hatchback!
Dave