I was brought up with the mantra that if something broke, first you took it apart to find out why, second you tried to repair the part that was broken, third you purchased a replacement part if stage 2 didn’t work or the ubiquitous Araldite wasn’t sufficient and then step four in extremis was to dismantle the object removing all ‘useful’ fixtures, flat sheet and anything else before consigning to the bin and purchasing a new one.
I appreciate that modern systems don’t lend themselves to this methodology but equally there is far more information available to explain what might be wrong and how to fix it and a larger pool of potential spares.
I personally take pride in keeping household technology running – our 15 year old dishwasher started to leak and it took the best part of a morning to totally dismantle to access and clean the main seal, coat with plumbing grade silicone and reassemble it. However, a) it doesn’t head for landfill, b) I don’t have to replace it with something no better, potentially built further down to a price and c) It gives me great satisfaction.
I admire others like Peter Cook6 for following the same route and encourage those who call the repair man to do a basic analysis themselves, saving callout and potential scams.
Simon