Posted by Neil Wyatt on 27/05/2020 19:20:05:
Posted by Bandersnatch on 27/05/2020 16:19:30:
FWIW, I typically resize my pics to 8" x 6" @120 pixels/inch which works for me and gives a decent size picture for the user if he clicks on it in a post.
The system automatically resizes them to 1200 pixels in the longest dimension when you up-load, and displays them as 600 in the largest dimension by default (you can right click and view to see them larger).
I'd heard that before, Neil and the values I'd used were an attempt to avoid some unknown 3rd party software rescanning/resizing my (carefully prepared ) pics. Particularly in the upward direction where pixels have to be invented.
Seems I'm failing.
I could resize to 10 x 7.5 x 120 or perhaps 8 x 6 x 150 but would I be wasting my time …. would they be "processed" anyway?
(And to answer the obvious question …. no I'm not really that bothered anyway. It's mostly a theoretical exercise. Time is hanging heav(il)y