Aircraft General Discussion

Advert

Aircraft General Discussion

Home Forums The Tea Room Aircraft General Discussion

Viewing 25 posts - 251 through 275 (of 2,013 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #122493
    Hi Speed Scrap
    Participant
      @hispeedscrap

      Maybe he holds a sign up saying " tune into the BBC for landing instructions"

      Oh, that wont work if they are asleep, maybe knock on the door?

      Dave

      Advert
      #122495
      Hi Speed Scrap
      Participant
        @hispeedscrap

        Ian,

        Dad got his medals 3 years ago at 90 yrs old.

        His story is on Page 213 of "Without Reserve"

        by Alan Paisey.

        Dave

        #122498
        Mike Poole
        Participant
          @mikepoole82104

          If it posed athreat to a population centre or other aircraft I am sure it would be shot down.

          Mike

          #122502
          John McNamara
          Participant
            @johnmcnamara74883

            My uncle George Johnson Now deceased, served two "tours" of of approximately 30 missions each as a Bombardier air gunner in the battle of Britain, an Australian defending England and world peace. While he survived and was highly successful  in his civilian life, he paid a heavy price, his health was affected by the stress. Lest we forget.

            Edited By John McNamara on 17/06/2013 15:17:52

            #122510
            Sub Mandrel
            Participant
              @submandrel

              When I was a kid Concorde was still allowed to go supersonic over the Bristol Channel and we would await they bangs (3pm I think) with great anticipation and excitement.

              Yesterday evening a Hercules turned over the house, well it was probably the front garden actually. It can have been no more than 250 feet up, far less than half the altitude the private planes and microlites go over at. – I promise this is not an exaggeration!

              Neil

              #122523
              Sub Mandrel
              Participant
                @submandrel

                Just had another one (presumably – I only heard it) go over – turbo-prop whine neesheeew all of a second and a half!

                Neil

                #122570
                Nigel Bennett
                Participant
                  @nigelbennett69913

                  One of my earliest memories (aged about five, I think) was seeing a whacking great Vulcan over our house (in the middle of a large suburban area). He can't have been more than a couple of hundred feet up, if that – it certainly worried me at the time!

                  My late uncle was a Lancaster pilot. He was sent on a training mission in 1944 for dealing with fighters. Once airborne, he was told that the fighters would be delayed by an hour, so to stooge about and await further instructions. He asked his navigator to give him a course for Leeds, where his bird (later my aunt!) lived. He banked steeply to fly up their street, and was so low that the prop-wash deposited half a hundredweight of assorted twigs, leaves and birds' nests on top of a waiting queue at the tram stop. On reaching his beloved's house, he stood the Lanc up on end and roared away. The tail-gunner was genuinely in fear of hitting the house chimney!

                  #122579
                  Cornish Jack
                  Participant
                    @cornishjack

                    If it posed athreat to a population centre or other aircraft I am sure it would be shot down.

                    Hmmm! Ah, yes, riiiight!sarcastic Not completely convinced that such a scenario would represent a feasible, let alone sensible response!! However, the skipper of the USS Vincennes might offer assistance!disgust

                    #122665
                    Niloch
                    Participant
                      @niloch
                      Posted by John McNamara on 17/06/2013 15:01:29:

                      My uncle George Johnson Now deceased, served two "tours" of of approximately 30 missions each as a Bombardier air gunner in the battle of Britain, an Australian defending England ……….

                      Sir,

                      As you so rightly say it was the battle of BRITAIN, your uncle was defending rather more than England. Scottish, Welsh, Northern Irish etc. inhabitants who lost loved ones might be rather upset by your insinuation. Referring to the UK/GB as England is inaccurate, ignorant and insensitive.

                      #122690
                      jason udall
                      Participant
                        @jasonudall57142

                        After every flight, QANTAS pilots fill out a form, known as a ‘gripe sheet’ to tell mechanics about problems with the aircraft. The mechanics fix the problem, and then document their repairs on the form.?Here are some actual maintenance problems submitted by the pilots (marked with a ‘P’) and the solutions recorded (marked by an ‘S’) by maintenance engineers, who by the way have a sense of humour:P: Left inside main tyre almost needs replacement.?S: Left inside main tyre almost replaced.?P: Test flight OK, auto-land very rough.?S: Auto-land not installed on this aircraft.?P: Something loose in cockpit.?S: Something tightened in cockpit.?P: Dead bugs on windshield.?S: Live bugs on back order.?P: Auto pilot in altitude-hold mode produces a 200 feet per minute descent.?S: Can’t reproduce problem on the ground.?P: Evidence of leak on right main landing gear.?S: Evidence removed.?P: DME volume unbelievably loud.?S: DME volume set to more believable level.?P: Friction locks cause throttle levers to stick.?S: That’s what friction locks are for.?P: IFF inoperative in OFF mode.?S: IFF always inoperative in OFF mode.?P: Suspect crack in windshield.?S: Suspect you’re right.?P: Number 3 engine missing.?S: Engine found on right wing after brief search.?P: Aircraft handles funny.?S: Aircraft warned to straighten up, fly right and be serious.?P: Target radar hums.?S: Reprogrammed target radar with lyrics.?P: Mouse in cockpit.?S: Cat installed in cockpit.?P: Noise coming from under instrument panel. Sounds like a midget pounding on something with a hammer.?S: Took hammer away from midget.

                        Edited By jason udall on 19/06/2013 21:17:09

                        #122691
                        jason udall
                        Participant
                          @jasonudall57142

                          Sorry guys editing in this “editor” proves …err..troublesome

                          #122720
                          Cornish Jack
                          Participant
                            @cornishjack

                            Jason – going back a bit to the days when aircraft toilets were the dreaded chemical Elsans, "toilet u/s" – "Toilet ground tested and found serviceable"!!smileythumbs up

                            In those days, GEs had to operate in some quite apalling conditions … they needed a sense of humour!!

                            Rgds

                            Bill

                            #122761
                            Grizzly bear
                            Participant
                              @grizzlybear

                              Hi Everyone, Dambusters. Some history. **LINK** Regards, Bear..

                              #122766
                              Sub Mandrel
                              Participant
                                @submandrel

                                If it posed athreat to a population centre or other aircraft I am sure it would be shot down.

                                Surely on 9/11 that would have been the right call, although a terrible deed to ask of a pilot.

                                Neil

                                #122769
                                Cornish Jack
                                Participant
                                  @cornishjack

                                  "Surely on 9/11 that would have been the right call, although a terrible deed to ask of a pilot."

                                  Um, really? … Let's see :-

                                  1. Persuade nice amenable hijackers to fly AWAY from problem areas.

                                  2. Hope that they will jettison those many TONS of highly explosive fuel.

                                  3. Pick your moment when the resultant uncontrolled arrival will miss problem areas.

                                  4,5,6 etc., etc.

                                  Still, if the prospects give you a warm glow of confidence and safety, don't let me disillusion you.

                                  Rgds

                                  Bill

                                  #122773
                                  Sub Mandrel
                                  Participant
                                    @submandrel

                                    HI Bill,

                                    No illusions – don't assume you only get a few minutes to act. Read this **LINK**

                                    If the passengers hadn't acted themselves, don't you think shooting the plane down wouldn't have been countenanced and probably the right thing to do?

                                    Neil

                                    #122835
                                    Ian S C
                                    Participant
                                      @iansc

                                      If the TradeTower aircraft had been intercepted, what could have been done? Shoot them down over a built up area– no. Divert them– no, the aircraft would continue, if the F- 16s got in the road they would be in collision, same effect as shooting down, but another aircraft crashing in the area. Perhaps a secure system of remote control is required to take control of aircraft. Ian S C

                                      #122837
                                      Cornish Jack
                                      Participant
                                        @cornishjack

                                        Ian – spot on!thumbs up

                                        Probably not much point chasing this argument, however, the reason the passengers reacted in the Pennsylvania aircraft was that they had heard what had already happened in NY, so not too many options.

                                        Trouble with the remote control idea is that the pax wouldn't accept the idea – trains, yes, cars, yes – aircraft, NO! Mind you, Mr O'Leary would probably welcome the concept with open arms!

                                        Rgds

                                        Bill

                                        #122862
                                        Sub Mandrel
                                        Participant
                                          @submandrel

                                          I won't labour the point any further, except to point out that at least two of the 9/11 planes flew for over 30 minutes and several hundred miles after turning around and air control learning of the hijack.

                                          That's plenty of time to make an assessment of risk and shoot down many miles from any major settlement.

                                          I'm not saying this would always be the case, of course.

                                          Neil

                                          #122868
                                          GaryM
                                          Participant
                                            @garym
                                            Posted by jason udall on 19/06/2013 21:16:05:
                                            After every flight, QANTAS pilots fill out a form, known as a 'gripe sheet' to tell mechanics about problems with the aircraft. The mechanics fix the problem, and then document their repairs on the form.?Here are some actual maintenance problems submitted by the pilots (marked with a 'P' and the solutions recorded (marked by an 'S' by maintenance engineers, who by the way have a sense of humour:P: Left inside main tyre almost needs replacement.?S: Left inside main tyre almost replaced.?P: Test flight OK, auto-land very rough.?S: Auto-land not installed on this aircraft.?P: Something loose in cockpit.?S: Something tightened in cockpit.?P: Dead bugs on windshield.?S: Live bugs on back order.?P: Auto pilot in altitude-hold mode produces a 200 feet per minute descent.?S: Can't reproduce problem on the ground.?P: Evidence of leak on right main landing gear.?S: Evidence removed.?P: DME volume unbelievably loud.?S: DME volume set to more believable level.?P: Friction locks cause throttle levers to stick.?S: That's what friction locks are for.?P: IFF inoperative in OFF mode.?S: IFF always inoperative in OFF mode.?P: Suspect crack in windshield.?S: Suspect you're right.?P: Number 3 engine missing.?S: Engine found on right wing after brief search.?P: Aircraft handles funny.?S: Aircraft warned to straighten up, fly right and be serious.?P: Target radar hums.?S: Reprogrammed target radar with lyrics.?P: Mouse in cockpit.?S: Cat installed in cockpit.?P: Noise coming from under instrument panel. Sounds like a midget pounding on something with a hammer.?S: Took hammer away from midget.

                                            Edited By jason udall on 19/06/2013 21:17:09

                                            Thanks for that Jason. Funniest thing I've read on this forum in weeks, although "doubleboost" John's posts on Mad Modder take some beating for all round education and entertainment value.

                                            Gary

                                            edit: where do these bloody 'smilies' come from.

                                            Edited By GaryM on 21/06/2013 22:53:19

                                            #122870
                                            jason udall
                                            Participant
                                              @jasonudall57142

                                              You're welcome. .sorry again for the formating. .just pasting it into this bloody editor had expended all available patience. .reformating it once pasted in seemed imposible at the time

                                              #122892
                                              Ian S C
                                              Participant
                                                @iansc

                                                The aircraft that bombed Hawaii were spotted on Radar, but it was not believed, so ignored until too late. Ian S C

                                                #123055
                                                Mike Poole
                                                Participant
                                                  @mikepoole82104

                                                  It would seem the RAF would  shoot an airliner down

                                                  **LINK**

                                                  Mike

                                                  Edited By Michael Poole on 24/06/2013 21:57:13

                                                  #123096
                                                  Ian S C
                                                  Participant
                                                    @iansc

                                                    My main worry would be the aircraft being over land when aquired as target. In the UK the chance of landing in a built up area is fairly high, so the casulties could far exceed the numbers on the AC. There seems that maybe there would be more success with the US sceme of Air Marshalls. Perhaps the subject should be shelved, or some one might get the wrong idea, but it is a worry. Ian S C

                                                    #123122
                                                    Sub Mandrel
                                                    Participant
                                                      @submandrel

                                                      HI Ian. Still only 6.8% of UK now classed as urban – but most of it is crowded into the conurbations.

                                                      Neil

                                                    Viewing 25 posts - 251 through 275 (of 2,013 total)
                                                    • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                                                    Advert

                                                    Latest Replies

                                                    Home Forums The Tea Room Topics

                                                    Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                                                    Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                                                    View full reply list.

                                                    Advert

                                                    Newsletter Sign-up