The sensible heat of the incoming steam is higher than that of the exhaust. The latent heat is as close to the same as makes no difference to us, and since we would only want to condense at the cold end anyway, that is the figure that matters to us.
There is still latent heat discarded in the suoercritical plants, since the latent heat that is thrown away is at the temperature and pressure prevailing in the condenser, eg near enough to 0psi and around 25 degrees C, depending on the source of the cooling water. But it will be less than in lower temperature and pressure plants, since less total weight of steam will be required for a given output power.
There is no power to be obtained directly from latent heat, since there is no temperature difference between the gaseous phase and the liquid phase. It follows from Sadie Carnots formula that the efficiency of the plant would be 0%. There is a trick you could do, if you had say a large supply of water at 100 degrees C, and another supply at room temperature, say 25 degrees C. Once you have excluded air from the system, the hot liquid will vaporise and flow to the cold side, and you can use the flow to generate power. But that is actually using the sensible heat, the hot side will get cooler unless you keep pumping in heat.
There have been efforts to find better working fluids than water, but all of the likely candidates have disadvantages much worse than the relatively high latent heat of water.
John