Just home from a family jolly, without reading any of the answers, I used the fence posts (2.4m), as per Journeyman, and got a low estimate of 13m and a high estimate of 16m. The average is 14.5m, pleasingly close to the planning application.
If the length of a tall object's shadow can be measured, the height is directly proportional to the length of a shadow thrown by a pole of known length at the same time. Provided the shadows are clear, the method is accurate and doesn't need trigonometry or measuring angles. A traditional Abney Level or Theodolite both work in poor weather but involve sums. If the object is a known distance from the observer positioned with a large-scale ordinance map, the stadia calculation could be rearranged to give a reasonable answer. Significantly better by laying out an accurate baseline with a surveyors chain, measuring the angle to the top, and doing the trig. The baseline must either be levelled or have the slope compensated for in the maths.
'Last of the Summer Wine' methods: Michael and I will fly a quadcopter fitted with GPS around the tower, fall in a cow-pat, and be chased through nettles by dogs and an angry farmer. Or we will climb the tower with a plumb line, only to discover it's not quite long enough. Then we'll go viral on the web after being filmed wetting ourselves due to having to wait beyond bladder endurance for an air-sea rescue helicopter. Michael will get the measurements right and I will cock-up the maths.
Dave