Having read all the above, I have to agree with Ketan and the positive comments.
My justification for my far too many comments on the forum are: Time served, qualified Engineer. (Until 1958 had never seen, let alone handled a lathe or a Milling machine. It was some 25 years later that I next touched a milling machine, and another twenty before I got my first lathe. ) Probably, the high point was being involved in spending £3M a week on one commodity. Pride came before a fall; I was made redundant!
Consequently, although familiar with machining, very much as a spectator in Industry, I have things to learn, and thinking of those coming into the hobby, wish to help them.
Hence my total agreement with Ketan over advising newcomers to be aware of their limitations and not try to sprint before they can even walk, and to learn the absolute basics.
I have to say that I do tend to point prospective purchasers in the direction of ARC. The only gift that I have received from them was when Ian sent the last two batteries of a type that they had stopped stocking, when I returned the incorrect ones..
I admire John Stevenson. He was a good practical Engineer, who would find a solution to many problems that others would consider to be past recovery. How do I know? From his postings on the Forum and meeting him for a very few minutes, face to face.
My dealings with ARC have always been cordial. The service is good, and always friendly and helpful.
When I ordered a Vertical Slide, intending to fit it to my ETR BL12-24, I knew that it would require an adaptor. Ketan's response was "If it doesn't work out, as long as it is unmarked, send it back for a refund" AMAZINGLY fair! That is probably by far the biggest single purchase that I have ever made from ARC.
There was a long post by someone in Australia, who had problems with a lathe, not bought from ARC. Ketan still provide advice and support.
Ketan advises folk about setting preload on bearings; often on machines that ARC have not sold. He is happy to explain why his business trades in the way that it does. I know that he would rather not sell a machine that was unfit for the purchaser's purpose, rather than have a disillusioned customer complaining to all and sundry and costing further sales.l I think that that is an honest way to do business.
So Neil and Jason had a machine for free in return for a review? Carrying out all the checks, writing up the report and taking all the photographs will have taken so much longer, that paying a fraction of the commercial rate for such an investigation would vastly exceed the value of the machine. Often, as a result of such reviews, the feedback results in improvements to the machine in terms of "user friendliness", if not in performance, durability or reliability.
Time to stop rambling
Howard