Posted by Bazyle on 30/08/2017 13:07:06:
Posted by SillyOldDuffer on 30/08/2017 11:43:10:
Can anyone explain why Imperial Measure retains a following whilst Imperial Money is unloved? They both have the same advantages and, arguably, money was more logical.
Dave
2 reasons
Firstly they didn't keep a point of reference the same and then decimalise everything around it but used an inconveniently large and new starting point – the metre. If they had taken the foot and decimalised it or something close like 300mm it would have fitted better with everyday life.
Secondly the name. If they had taken a metric based length, 300mm again, but called it the 'new foot' it would have been more acceptable. I believe if instead of the Euro they had called the item the 'new pound' = 'new franc' = 'new deutschmark' etc in each country it would have worked.
Good theory Bazyle, but the starting point of the Imperial system was never the Foot, it was the Yard, which is nearly as big as the Metre.
Imperial measure is cuddly with a sort of human feel to it. But so was old money. Bring back the Groat!
Dave
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 30/08/2017 18:03:19