4 Jaw Self-centering Chuck runout problem

Advert

4 Jaw Self-centering Chuck runout problem

Home Forums General Questions 4 Jaw Self-centering Chuck runout problem

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 32 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #216959
    Nicholas Lee
    Participant
      @nicholaslee

      Hello,
      I have a new SOBA 100 mm 4 Jaw Self-centering Chuck (threaded 1 1/8 x 12 tpi to suit Myford) purchased from Chronos, to which I have attached a threaded adapter so it will fit in the R8 taper of my milling machine. This was done to allow me to do some vertical turning, as I don't own a lathe, I only have a milling machine.

      I have just tried using this set-up for the first time, only to discover an unusably large axial runout problem.

      Admittedly, when the chuck arrived it was very stiff to operate (essentially siezed solid) so I stripped it down, cleaned it carefully, and re assembled it. Then it ran freely as it should do.
      When the 4 jaws are fully closed they all meet together as expected, all four sequentially numbered jaws touch each other at the same time, so (to my inexperienced eye), it seems like it has been reassembled properly.

      Gently doing up the jaws onto a 1" dia. brass rod (2" long), I checked the runout with a DTI and it was right off the guage dial. It is a visible amount of runout, so probably a millimetre, maybe more.

      I initially thought the whole chuck might have been off-centre on the mill's spindle but I ran a DTI around the outside of the chuck body as I rotated the spindle and the chuck was centred to better than 0.1mm.

      When the jaws are adjusted so they are barely touching the test rod, the rod seems to be gripped evenly by all four jaws, with no obvious wobble.

      Can anyone suggest either what school-boy error I might have made to cause this problem, or conversely how I might re-machine the jaws or chuck so they grip workpieces properly without the huge axial runout?

      I am new to modelmaking as a hobby, and I have no formal training in machining so I would welcome your advice.

      Best Wishes,
      Nicholas Lee

      Advert
      #24279
      Nicholas Lee
      Participant
        @nicholaslee
        #216982
        Roderick Jenkins
        Participant
          @roderickjenkins93242

          Hi Nicholas,

          You say that the jaws have been assembled sequentially, but are they in the correct slots? Is jaw 1 in slot 1? I would hope that at least one of the slots is numbered. If not I would try moving all the jaws round by one and testing again.

          HTH

          Rod

          #216984
          Martin Connelly
          Participant
            @martinconnelly55370

            I would not use the outside of the chuck as a guide to how well it has been mounted. I would find exactly what the TIR is close to the jaws and also 50 to 75mm away from the jaws. If there is a significant difference between the two I would be looking at the angle the chuck has been mounted at. There may be contamination in a joint somewhere that needs removing. If the readings are the same then there is an axial displacement. As Rod said check the jaws are in the correct slots if it is marked 1 to 4. If not try rotating the jaws around the chuck to see if one position gives a better reading than the rest.

            Most chuck mounting involves a register or two (lathe spindle and chuck backplate) to correctly position the chuck and to do so repeatedly. Does you setup have suitable registers and if so what is the run out on them?

            Martin

            #216987
            Emgee
            Participant
              @emgee

              As Martin suggests, check for run-out of the chuck mounting surfaces on your threaded adaptor with it fitted in the mill spindle. Any run-out indicated increases the further you move from the measuring point and will be several times greater beyond the chuck jaws.

              Emgee

              #216990
              John Haine
              Participant
                @johnhaine32865

                If it was new and seized solid on delivery I suspect it's duff and would send it straight back. Would a 3 jaw not have been better?

                #216993
                Lambton
                Participant
                  @lambton

                  Nicholas,

                  Self-centering chucks, whether 3 or 4 jaw, have to be assembled in a particular sequence.

                  First, as already suggested identify the numbered jaws and the numbered slots.

                  With the chuck on its back on the bench turn the scroll round, observing the number one slot until the outermost end of the scroll appears, then turn it back a little just enough to allow the No 1 jaw to enter the slot and push the jaw down as far as it will go (not very far) then turn the scroll so that it engages the first tooth of the jaw and starts to pull it inwards verifying correct engagement. Turn the scroll until it appears in the No 2 slot and repeat the above with the no 2 jaw and so on with the other two jaws.

                  This procedure ensures that all the jaws are synchronised with the scroll.

                  This should solve the problem.

                  #216997
                  roy entwistle
                  Participant
                    @royentwistle24699

                    I wouldn't consider holding round bar in a self centering four jaw a three jaw should be more accurate and rigid

                    Roy

                    #217002
                    Steve Withnell
                    Participant
                      @stevewithnell34426

                      I use a 125mm self centering TOS 4- Jaw chuck in the lathe. Theoretically, a 3 jaw chuck should be better than a 4 jaw for round bar. In my case the 4 jaw TOS has better run out than the 3 Jaw chuck supplied with the lathe, both are more than good enough for a hobby lathe.

                      Given the 4-jaw will hold square and elliptical stock, I only use the 3-jaw for hex bar now.

                      So how do I go about setting up chucks?

                      Aside from stripping and cleaning my process has been.

                      1. Pop mark a point on the spindle.

                      2. Fit a backplate, pop mark to align alongside the mark on the spindle

                      3. Turn the backplate in-situ to reset the register faces for the chuck.

                      4. Mount the chuck and pop mark to align with the pop mark on the back plate.

                      This should produce the very best alignment in terms of run out, and everytime you take the chuck off the machine, you can put it back exactly where it came from. Similarly, if you need to strip the chuck, the backplate can always go back exactly where it came from.

                      Issues – if the backplate is already 'a fit' with the chuck, you have to lose some of the meat out of the backplate, but this has not caused any noticeable problems. For the four jaw, the spigot on the new backplate was a bigger diameter than the chuck register, so perfect for this treatment

                      Final point – to get best run out keep everything scrupulously clean when assembling chuck to backplate, chuck to lathe, chuck jaws. Any trapped bit of swarf has the ability to throw out the alignment. Same with machined tapers, if the socket isn't clean a bit of detritis gets trapped between the taper and socket, again there is the potential for upsetting the alignment and increasing the run out. Problem is, it tends only to be noticeable when its bad, when it's tiny, it's usually found when the job didn't turn (pardon the pun) out to spec.

                      Bear in mind I am an expert in these matters – I've nearly finished my third engine… Feedback is a gift

                      Happy Christmas

                      Steve

                      #217049
                      Ajohnw
                      Participant
                        @ajohnw51620

                        Personally I wouldn't use a self centring 4 jaw for holding round work. They aren't meant to be used for that. Round stock generally wont be perfectly round and 4 jaws can't grip it evenly as a result. A 3 jaw chuck can grip slightly out of round work with an even pressure on all jaws providing the work is set in it correctly but even with these a ham fisted approach can result in 2 of the jaws gripping more firmly than the other one and that will result in more run out than the chuck is actually capable of.

                        4 jaws just make that aspect worse. You could try rotating the bar just at the point when the jaws are closing on it to help them seat evenly but .you are still likely to have problems. People often do even when using 3 jaw chucks.

                        John

                        #217050
                        Nicholas Lee
                        Participant
                          @nicholaslee

                          Thank you for all the helpful advice.
                          I will work my way through the various tests suggested.
                          The body of the chuck has no marks to say which jaws go in which slots, there is only a ‘O’ stamped near the (single) key hole.
                          As I also wanted to use the chuck on a dividing head with square stock, I bought a 4-jaw, however in hindsight I wish I had ordered the independent jaws version.
                          I can’t send this chuck back as I had already drilled and tapped a hole for an M8 grubscrew which I added to ensure the chuck doesn’t unscrew itself from the threaded adapter if the spindle stops quickly.

                          #217060
                          Lambton
                          Participant
                            @lambton

                            Nicholas,

                            I have not seen a chuck without slot identification marks. look into the actual slot , level with the scroll at the outer edge . One of the problems with some Far Eastern chucks is that slot numbering is not punched very deep making difficulty in reading. Have a good look however as there will be some marks.

                            #217072
                            Ajohnw
                            Participant
                              @ajohnw51620

                              You can tell the jaw order by looking at the back of the jaws. If that is out they will be all over the place. I understand that the zero mark usually indicates the position for jaw one – that jaw is the one that can be pushed in least before it's scrolls meet the scrolls in the chuck itself. Jaw 2 goes in further and so on. The scroll in the chuck needs to be wound round so that it's start is just before the 1st slot then each jaw is inserted in turn while pushing on them and closing the chuck.

                              laughJust hope I have the position of the scrolls on the back of the jaws the right way round. I do it without even thinking about it or look at the numbers on them. Where the marks are absent the usual trick is to mark them with a centre punch. One dot for one, 2 for two and so on.

                              You could try rotating the bar just as the jaws close on it – hard to explain and there is a bit of a knack to it. It needs to be rotated when all of the jaws are touching the bar. It probably will help once you have the technique correct.

                              John

                              #217081
                              JasonB
                              Moderator
                                @jasonb
                                Posted by Nicholas Lee on 19/12/2015 14:30:33:
                                I had already drilled and tapped a hole for an M8 grubscrew which I added to ensure the chuck doesn't unscrew itself from the threaded adapter if the spindle stops quickly.

                                Have you tried it wiothout your added grub screw, could be that is throwing the chuck off to one side.

                                #217163
                                Nicholas Lee
                                Participant
                                  @nicholaslee

                                  Correction: On closer inspection, the chuck body and jaws are actually both stamped with 1..4 numbering, and the jaws were all in the correct slots.

                                  As soon as I get the chance I will make some more investigative measurements.

                                  #217177
                                  Ketan Swali
                                  Participant
                                    @ketanswali79440

                                    Nicholas,

                                    Unless I have missed your comments about this somewhere, what make and model of mill are you putting the 100mm chuck on?

                                    Ketan at ARC.

                                    #217182
                                    phil burley
                                    Participant
                                      @philburley12227

                                      I bought a chinese 3 jaw from a well known dealer , turned out to have a huge run out inspite of certifates with it . Deslaer changed it no problem , second one is fine

                                      #217201
                                      Nicholas Lee
                                      Participant
                                        @nicholaslee

                                        Ok, I have made some more measurements.

                                        The rod gripped in the chuck seems to be perfectly vertical to the machine bed, it just isn't on the same-axis as the mill's spindle.

                                        I checked this with a set-square mounted in a vice on the milling bed.

                                        There isn't even a chink of light between the set-square and the side of the rod, so it is nice and vertical.

                                        However, as the spindle is rotated 360 degrees, a gap of 1.30 mm evenly opens up and then closes again between the set-square and the rod. This gap is the same all the way up the rod, and was measured with a digital vernier.

                                        I measured the concentricity between the outside of the chuck and the spindle-axis and that is on-axis to within 0.2 mm, which is not great, but it is miles better than the 1.30 mm of error where the jaws meet. I measured this to see if the chuck-body was badly fitted to its backplate. I might be able to adjust-out that 0.2mm by nudging the chuck-body central as I do up the backplate bolts, but there certainly won't be 1.30 mm of adjustment range.

                                        (The mill is a SIEG Super X3, and I measured the spindle alignment to better than 10 microns, so it is not that.)

                                        (Also, removing my set-screw makes no measurable difference)

                                        Basically, the axis were the chuck jaws meet isn't in line with the spindle axis.

                                        Edited By Nicholas Lee on 20/12/2015 14:45:25

                                        #217207
                                        Keith Long
                                        Participant
                                          @keithlong89920

                                          Nicholas – first thing is talk to Chronos, let them know that you're experiencing problems. The fact that you've drilled it for a locking bolt isn't going to alter inherent run-out if it's there.

                                          Secondly you need to make sure that your R8 adapter is truly concentric, if it isn't then that's another problem that you should take up with whoever supplied it or made it for you.

                                          Looking at the Chronos site, the backplate of the chuck looks as though it can be fitted in any of 4 orientations, have you tried turning round and checking the run-out to see if it varies, it's possible that when you received it, the backplate was not in the best position, if someone else has done anything to the chuck – why was it so stiff?

                                          The amount of adjustment you're looking for isn't 1.3mm – that's the TIR (total indicated run-out), the eccentricity is half that so you might stand a chance of getting that if the bolt holes have clearance, but I'd expect to find a spigot location between the backplate and the chuck body.

                                          Above all else you need to make sure that all mating surfaces are clean and free of burrs or bruises, they can easily throw the chuck out of line.

                                          #217215
                                          Nicholas Lee
                                          Participant
                                            @nicholaslee

                                            Thanks Keith,

                                            I had put a location marking scratch across the join between the chuck body and the back plate, prior to initial disassembly. That's how I know the backplate was re-assembled in the correct orientation, as like you said, there are 4 ways to do this.

                                            The chuck was initially stiff because one of the jaws was binding in its slideway. In fact, with the scroll wheel removed, that jaw was a hammer-fit in its slideway. A light rub with a stone was all that was required to make it slide smoothly like the others. Probably a burr left over from manufacture.

                                            I checked the R8 adapter and it seems ok. Especially as the backplate (when screwed onto the R8 adapter) only has an external TIR of about 0.1mm

                                            I will try adjusting the backplate bolts to see if the chuck body will move sideways by 0.65mm; before I do any complaining to Chronos.

                                            I will also (as you suggest) make sure everything is nice and clean and smooth.

                                            #217222
                                            Robert Dodds
                                            Participant
                                              @robertdodds43397

                                              Nicholas,

                                              The chuck has two sets of jaws? Have you checked the concentricity using the alternate set of jaws.
                                              This is not the best way to clamp a piece of bar but might indicate to you where the error lies.

                                              Bob D

                                              #222280
                                              Nicholas Lee
                                              Participant
                                                @nicholaslee

                                                Update:
                                                The chuck itself seems to be 'ok', but the R8-to-myford threaded adapter, when screwed into the backplate is slightly wonky,

                                                having taken advice from my local model engineering society, I have decided to permanently bond the adapter to the backplate, then machine the backplate while it is on the machine so that it is exact, and to correct-out any problems.

                                                This just leaves the problem of machining the backplate material nice and flat.

                                                I am having trouble getting a good surface finish when turning the backplate.

                                                (Surface finish is more like an LP than a mirror)

                                                NB: This is the first time I have tried doing a turning operation, I am a total beginner at this.

                                                I'm guessing it is made of a soft cast iron, but I have no way to be sure. The chips were small, which makes me suspect it is cast iron.

                                                I have used my one-and-only turning tool, which uses a carbide insert. Turning at about 500rpm I didn't seem to need any coolant (my cuts were very shallow). Obviously as I am doing a facing operation, the effective SFPM varies with the radius.

                                                Any advice on improving the finish, or grinding it flat, or whatever I am supposed to actually do?

                                                Would an oil stone held against it while it was turning be a good idea or not??

                                                #222287
                                                Neil Wyatt
                                                Moderator
                                                  @neilwyatt

                                                  Sounds like you may be traversing the tool too quickly. How long does it take you to face right across the backplate?

                                                  Also,carbide tools don't give their best with shallow cuts. Might be best to get an HSS tool with a small radius on the end and try that.

                                                  Neil

                                                  #222302
                                                  frank brown
                                                  Participant
                                                    @frankbrown22225

                                                    For the best finish you need a tool with an almost flat cutting edge, just a radius across it. If you have any broken drills say 1/4" or bigger. drill a suitable hole for it in a block of steel, it would be nice to drill and tap a clamping screw to hold the stubby drill, or if not, degrease and use epoxy or super glue. Now to grind the tool up. Select a bit of the drills metal that is full diameter at halfway through its height. This is where the new cutting edge is going to be. So grind away the end, dipping in water to stop over heating, until this part of the drill is at the end. Grind away the underneath so the cutting edge is a little forward of the metal under it. looking at the tool from the side grind away the top to give the top of the cutting edge a flat top. Looking at the tool from the top, you should have a very sharp corner, very gently turn this into radius. Run a small stone around the radius, angling it so it is removing material lower then the cutting edge. This is make sure that your radius is smooth and there is a little front clearance.

                                                    Now mount the tool in the tool post and swivel it so the centre of the radius is nearest the surface to be faced. For facing the absolute height of the tool is not critical, by eye is enough.

                                                    Don't use a stone, it will block up and become useless for anything other then polishing stuff !!

                                                    Frank

                                                    #222340
                                                    Ian S C
                                                    Participant
                                                      @iansc

                                                      Use a HSS tool, at least half the speed, 150 would be better, and it's going to be a slow process. I presume you are holding the tool in the machine vice, and traversing the table. About .25 mm / .010", maybe less is enough of a cut.

                                                      Why would you need a 100 mm chuck in a mill? On a rotary table, or dividing head yes, I used my mill to turn a part for my lathe at one time, but unless there was no other way, I would not do it again, I'd just use my Sure Adept.

                                                      Ian S C

                                                    Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 32 total)
                                                    • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                                                    Advert

                                                    Latest Replies

                                                    Home Forums General Questions Topics

                                                    Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                                                    Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                                                    View full reply list.

                                                    Advert

                                                    Newsletter Sign-up