David
I can't understand how, as Editor, you can be "told" that you "had to include next issue as well as the bit on contents page" ! Who edits the Magazine ? You or the design staff ?
With a few exceptions, I'm still happy with the mix and breadth of the articles published – otherwise, I won't keep subscribing – and I can take or leave the new look to these. I don't see, however, how the changes you have made will attract anyone to buy even one issue unless they are already interested in the hobby. In fact, putting the Contents on page 6/7 instead of 3 is more likely to deter someone "browsing in Smith's".
There isn't much difference between the new cover and the previous version, apart from a few words and a background colour change to the title, except the location of the issue number. OK, MEW is trying to attract new readers, but how does having the issue number on the top-LH Corner deter them ?
I agree that, without advertising, the cover price would have to be so high that it would not be affordable, however, there is a large number of other magazines – including ME and EIM for our hobby – that manage to keep a better balance between the location of the adverts and the editorial content.
Unfortunately, it looks like, in common with many "industries" in the UK these days, MEW would rather try to attract new customers than keep – or, at least, listen to the requirements of – their existing customers.
I note that, apart from Editorial staff, all other staff on ME are the same as those on MEW. I just hope that ME won't suffer the same "new look".
Andy