Wont go into why but we now have 2 isp's and 2 networks in the house. One network can use the printer directly over wifi but the other can't.
I get lost in the myriad of features that can be used in routers and wonder if there is a simple solution in that area. There's gateways, port forwarding and other bits and pieces.
As far as actual machines go there doesn't seem to be a direct way of doing this on windows or mac. I'm on Linux which might help but am wired to the other router. I could add wifi to my PC. I have actually and the system can see that it's there along with the wired connection but not sure how I can go any further.
I print via cups – another area that I soon get lost in that has features I have no idea about at all. I understand it will even broadcast hey there is a printer here even over the web.
Not sure quite what you mean, John. Are these physically separate networks, each with its own router and broadband connection? If so the reason is that the printer is connected to one router but not the other. Usually the computer accesses the printer over your local network, i.e. via the router, not directly, so a computer on the other network would have to go over the internet which probably the router settings don't allow (you wouldn't want people printing remotely on your printer would you?). It would be very slow anyway as the bitrate would be limited to the uplink of one of the broadband links.
I suspect the problem is due to both routers being on different sub-nets (The first 3 numbers of the IP address are the same)
I would guess that the Computer that is on the same sub-net as the printer is the one that can print.
Without knowing how everything is configured, it is not easy to offer a simple solution, also I don't know linux. You could try setting the sub-net mask to be 255.255.0.0
When I ran a small ISP in Yorkshire, we did just this with two phone lines, then broadcast the resulting bandwidth round the village using a wireless network.
Alternatively if you simply want to print from both networks rather than have the computers talk to each other you could try a WIFI to USB or Ethernet to USB print server and use that for one network and the existing WIFI capabilities of the printer for the other.
Also you may already have done this but it's worth ensuring your 2 WiFi's are on different channels – 1, 6 and 11 have the most separation – use any 2 but ideally not one that your neighbour uses.
Just a thought. Maybe bypass the hardware route and do it in software (if it is convenient to do for your application).
I use Teamviewer to access remote computers. You can control a remote computer using Teamviewer. You take control of the remote computer and run applications on it. There is a facility whereby you run an application on the remote computer, but get it to print to a printer local to your computer. It maybe inconvenient to use with your scenario though, as you have to log into the remote computer etc.
You can also print to a printer on the internet using google cloud print. I've never used it. I'm sure there are other bits of software.
Don't know if Google or Teamviewer works in Linux (whatever that is).
Yes they are 2 separate routers with their own broadband connection. The obvious thing for me to do is to add wifi to my machine but while I can switch from my normal connection to that it looks like I can't have both up at the same time.
One router is from talktalk and the other virgin. I do have a real business router as well that I could use on either of them.
France's link looks promising but will need some studying to allow me to comprehend it. In practice it's only me that needs to make the link to the printer. I spent some time looking around on the web but didn't find anything like the link.
I'd wondered about the various remote log in options but as Steven mentions they have to be logged into in order to be safe.
Also wifi dongles of various types. I wasn't aware that print servers were available so will take a look. In the past I have run a printer via a direct wire and by wifi so that might work out. There were some simple wifi links about that could be assigned a static ip mainly for linking things that could only use wire but they seem to have disappeared. They were very crude too.
I suspect if I do anything devious in the router that is connected to the printer win or mac may have problems. Especially mac. We also have ipads. These both seem to demand that the printer is on the machines normal network and no way to assign an address to it. Linux can be a pain as people sometimes do have to assign an address to the printer. I'd guess there will be some way of assigning an address in windows.
Noticing a comment about wifi speed I feel that the best answer is a business router but they all seem to use ppoe over 10 base T so need a modem in bridge mode to connect to a phone line. In bridge mode they hardly need to do anything so will reach high bandwidths. They cost more too. One reason I have this problem is probably because I disconnected one of these and fitted the talktalk thing and didn't re install it. Any time I complain to talktalk they more or less insist on having one of their routers on the end, On the other hand there is a lot of internet and other activity here at times so 2 isp's taking phone deals into account makes some sense – well sort of anyway.
HP (and others) do cheap printers that you can print to from anywhere in the world over the internet. Quite easy to set up, my wife has done it (although she's quite network savvy now, having to typically add 1 or 2 devices a week!)
It's a Brother colour laser. I do need to look at the manual for it more thoroughly. I don't have any problems connecting things the normal way or setting static IP's if needed etc. The rest though is a black hole as I have never needed to do it.
If the printer will do it then setting a suitable IP address and changes to the sub net mask in the routers should look after it. Not sure I would like to put a web ip address on it. Then comes the Apple Talk problem – there silly rather insecure method of driving things. I can fake that from Linux though and provide an apple talk print service and have done in the past but we eventually bought a printer that will work with apple all on it's own.
I've recently (last week) bought and installed a Brother mono laser printer on Windows and Linux PC's, it's wireless too and connects to the network via the wireless router. Albeit I'm only using one network. In your situation I'd probably add a wireless USB adaptor and connect to the printer network with that and keep the wired connection for the other network. Configure a second network in your Linux system settings to use the USB adaptor. I don't know which distro you're using, I have OpenSuse 42.1 and would use the Yast2 utility.
For my printer I had to set up a manual I.P. address on the router, although it will work with DHCP I had problems with that, but manual is fine.
Brother also have some Linux drivers for some of their printers on their website. For the printer I have I downloaded a tar.gz file which unpacked to 3 separate directories "etc" , "var" and "opt". I had to check in each of the directories and if there were any sub-directories or files they had to be created/copied to the corresponding directories on my system. Brother also offer a printer install script but I think it only works if your printer is configured in a supported list.
I used one of these many years ago and it worked well but there are a lot of variations out there. the switch is manual . each time you press the button it swaps printer. you can get automatic versions but at greater cost
If I could run a cable to the printer it would be easy but no chance of me doing that. It has to be over wifi and in a fashion that allows all the Apple devices to still find the printer automatically. I did spend some time looking at what an Ipad can do in this line as I gained the impression that it could connect to two networks at the same time. It can't.
I'm running OpenSuse too and have to set a static ip address for the printer. This seems to be down to cups the print server. It will only find printers when asked to so if the router reboots and the ip address changes it has to be told to find it again. It''s a minor inconvenience really. Apple get round it by broadcasting data that includes IP addresses which is why it's viewed as insecure but I suppose as it's over wifi people would only have problems if they have a hacker for a neighbour.
DHCP doesn't set static addresses. It sets them on the fly and they can vary each time the router is rebooted. All of the routers I have used have an over ride on this that involves setting a static ip address in relationship to a particular piece of equipment's mac address.
Some routers make this easy to do. Some show the mac addresses on an interface page that doesn't allow the static address to be set so they have to be written down.
I use Teamviewer to access remote computers. You can control a remote computer using Teamviewer. You take control of the remote computer and run applications on it.
Don't know if Google or Teamviewer works in Linux (whatever that is).
Lots on radio four this morning warning people that scammers are using teamviewer to rip people off.
If someone you don't know tells you to download Teamviewer so they can 'fix your computer' or 'deal with people hacking your computer' etc. DON'T
I had a series of these claiming to be representing MS and telling me my machine was screaming for help. Odd as I run Linux.
Another one did get a bit further – your windows machine is causing problems as it has a virus. Only windows machine at the time was my son's. Fortunately they asked him to do something he was aware of that was stupid really – clearing out windows fault history so he disconnected.
People may get asked for the IP address – don't. They may even tell people what to do and ask what the pc shows.
Slightly related. I noticed something odd about nuisance phone calls. I might be wrong but they seemed to hit a peak when I ordered something or the other and entered my phone number – particularly with carrier services. I've started entering it incorrectly on purpose. Much to my amazement they seem to have dropped off but I also use caller id and if I don't recognise the number I don't answer the phone. Real callers will use the answer phone. The caller ID often shows an incorrect sd code anyway.
DHCP doesn't set static addresses. It sets them on the fly and they can vary each time the router is rebooted. All of the routers I have used have an over ride on this that involves setting a static ip address in relationship to a particular piece of equipment's mac address.
Some routers make this easy to do. Some show the mac addresses on an interface page that doesn't allow the static address to be set so they have to be written down.
Maybe different makes of router use different terminology.
(yes, I do know what DHCP is)
With a true static IP you have to first configure the printer to use a static IP and specify the IP. You then have to tell the router that the printer's mac address uses a static IP and set the router accordingly (most routers will let you use a mix of static and DHCP addressing)
With a fixed DHCP address, you do nothing at the printer and you let the router use its (normally default) DHCP addressing. The only difference is that you tell it to *reserve* a specific and constant (DHCP) IP and use it always for the printer's mac address.
As far as the printer is concerned the address generation is still DHCP. All you've done is to ensure that it receives the same IP each time. I actually do this on all my network devices not just printers since there are some advantages.
….. but then, if you feel you know better that's (of course) your prerogative. You're the one with the problem – I was just trying to help.
DHCP doesn't set static addresses. It sets them on the fly and they can vary each time the router is rebooted. All of the routers I have used have an over ride on this that involves setting a static ip address in relationship to a particular piece of equipment's mac address.
Some routers make this easy to do. Some show the mac addresses on an interface page that doesn't allow the static address to be set so they have to be written down.
Maybe different makes of router use different terminology.
(yes, I do know what DHCP is)
With a true static IP you have to first configure the printer to use a static IP and specify the IP. You then have to tell the router that the printer's mac address uses a static IP and set the router accordingly (most routers will let you use a mix of static and DHCP addressing)
With a fixed DHCP address, you do nothing at the printer and you let the router use its (normally default) DHCP addressing. The only difference is that you tell it to *reserve* a specific and constant (DHCP) IP and use it always for the printer's mac address.
As far as the printer is concerned the address generation is still DHCP. All you've done is to ensure that it receives the same IP each time. I actually do this on all my network devices not just printers since there are some advantages.
….. but then, if you feel you know better that's (of course) your prerogative. You're the one with the problem – I was just trying to help.
Edited By Bandersnatch on 14/03/2016 17:25:50
Yes I know that you are trying to help but I thought it was worth clarifying as the routers I have used don't offer static dhcp but do offer the facility to set a static ip. I usually chose an easy one to remember on a printer such as endin in .200 so that I can access it and set a bookmark via a browser.
It's also a problem I don't have this problem. Not that this matters as some others may find it interesting.
I use Teamviewer to access remote computers. You can control a remote computer using Teamviewer. You take control of the remote computer and run applications on it.
Don't know if Google or Teamviewer works in Linux (whatever that is).
Lots on radio four this morning warning people that scammers are using teamviewer to rip people off.
If someone you don't know tells you to download Teamviewer so they can 'fix your computer' or 'deal with people hacking your computer' etc. DON'T
Neil
Thanks for the heads up on that.
I've have been contacted by quite a few of our Asian friends, who, very considerately, were just giving me a call to offer to fix my computer problem (the one that I was totally unaware of).
On each occasion they have prompted me to download some remote control software LogMeIn, Windows Remote, PcAnyWhere, Teamviewer and the like.
I've had no security problems whatsoever using remote control software, just don't let someone else take control of it!
Oh, and if you are downloading any software, make sure you are downloading it from the official 'manufacturer' software site, and not some 3rd party provider who can offload god knows what on you via 'their' installer.