JasonB: I have certain trust assumptions I make and believe it is true points or surfaces that matters
Trusting points/Surcfaces:
(Till proved incorrectly manufactured or otherwise)
0a-The spindle centre…..I put the dial test-indicator inside the spindle centre and trust that in my case that is more accurate to the operation than any outside surface of the gearbox where they used body putty as filler.
0b-The X-axis hardware metal surfaces:These surfaces top and around looks very neatly grinded. I do not trust this mill's bed 4x grooves to be accurate on the insides, so say for example I put a precission parralel in groove to press a square and the sweep from that, I dont trust this way here.
Step-1:
So I clamp the precission square to the front of the X-axis bed, then position the test-dial indicator from spindle. locked out its backlash with hand so indicator stay put(Lowest gear set), I then swept the other part (90degrees of square) with the dial indicator by cranking the Y-axis. Now to me if this stay zero reading my X-axis is moving square to my Y-axis and at the same time I can claim my swivel bed is lined up at 100% zero mark.
Step-2:I Now assume X-axis is moving square to Y-axis.(Step-1 result)
So now I dial in the vice fixed jaw with dial test-indicator sweeping the fixed jaw by cranking the X-Axis.
Result: I now trust that the fix jaw of my vice move square to the Y-axis as I wanted in this case as I crank the X-Axis…I also trust that if I clam a 1-2-3 block in vice, it will swept zero reading if I crank the Y-Axis.
If I now cut a block square, and its not square……I have a problem to discuss with company I bought it from..
Edited By Chris Mate on 20/01/2022 12:47:13
Edited By Chris Mate on 20/01/2022 12:48:39