Birds and aeroplanes

Advert

Birds and aeroplanes

Home Forums The Tea Room Birds and aeroplanes

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #746487
    Speedy Builder5
    Participant
      @speedybuilder5

      If most birds are high winged monoplanes, why are most aircraft low wing monos ?

      Advert
      #746488
      Brian Wood
      Participant
        @brianwood45127

        I think it has to do with the propulsion system birds are forced to use with all the musculature to work the wings anchored to the body below the wings.

        Aircraft have other options.

        Brian

        #746489
        Nick Wheeler
        Participant
          @nickwheeler

          How many aircraft flap their wings?

          #746496
          Fulmen
          Participant
            @fulmen

            Some do, but only once.

            #746497
            SillyOldDuffer
            Moderator
              @sillyoldduffer

              One of the advantages of a low-wing aircraft is increased cabin space.  Birds don’t carry passengers or cargo!   Other reasons might include a bird’s requirement to do precision landings and hawk avoiding aerobatics. Both need a high-degree of slow-speed control.

              Dave

              #746506
              mgnbuk
              Participant
                @mgnbuk

                One of the advantages of a low-wing aircraft is increased cabin space.

                Yet most heavy transport aircraft are high wing ?

                Nigel B.

                #746507
                JA
                Participant
                  @ja

                  A high wing on an aeroplane gives good lateral stability. Due to a lack of lateral stabilty very early (pre-Wright Brothers) flyers ended their flights by side slipping into the gound after about 30 yards or so. At altitude lack of lateral stability results in some very interest events. Wing dihedral also gives good lateral stability.

                  As for birds, I would suggest they approximate to a blended body (like what airliners should have been like for the last 30 years).

                  Interesting question, very complex and replies should run for sometime.

                  JA

                  #746509
                  Bazyle
                  Participant
                    @bazyle
                    On mgnbuk Said:

                    One of the advantages of a low-wing aircraft is increased cabin space.

                    Yet most heavy transport aircraft are high wing ?

                    Nigel B.

                    Transports need body close to ground for unloading.

                    #746513
                    duncan webster 1
                    Participant
                      @duncanwebster1

                      I suggest birds have high wings because muscles to pull them down (ie flap) only work in tension.

                      #746531
                      Peter Cook 6
                      Participant
                        @petercook6

                        Birds evolved from four limbed dinosaurs. Four legged creatures typically have one at each corner for stability. Wings evolved from the front corners. It’s the same reason my arms are attached to my shoulders not my waist.

                        #746627
                        duncan webster 1
                        Participant
                          @duncanwebster1

                          deleted

                          #746744
                          Martin Connelly
                          Participant
                            @martinconnelly55370

                            Look at the length of landing gear on some of the high wing aircraft. A wide body transport can get away with fuselage mounted wheels but a narrow body passenger aircraft does not want the extra weight of a long landing gear with the associated increase in stress on the mounting points due to leverage. If, on the other hand, you are mounting large propellers on a wing mounted engine then height is your friend and so a long landing gear becomes more acceptable. Like most engineering designs there are usually compromises somewhere so there are no hard and fast rules.

                            Martin C

                            #746881
                            John Doe 2
                            Participant
                              @johndoe2

                              A high wing requires either very long and therefore stronger landing gear legs, or strengthened body framing to take the loads of body mounted landing gear. Both options add weight and complication.

                              If all loads can be taken by the wing structure it generally results in a more efficient design.

                              With a high wing and wing mounted landing gear, you have to accommodate the retracted landing gear somewhere within the wing, or within the engine nacelles, which adds complication and structural challenges. With a low wing, and wing mounted landing gear, the gear can retract sideways between the wing spars, and the wheels themselves can be accommodated in the bottom of the fuselage, so only the strut needs fitting into a channel in the wing.

                              High wings also make access to wing mounted engines that bit harder – you need step ladders or platforms to reach them – not necessarily easily available on busy ramps at busy airports – so something as simple as checking and topping up the engine oil is more difficult and takes longer. Airbus has underslung wing mounted engines which can easily be accessed for oil checks while standing on the ground, and also it is easier to inspect the engines during the walk-around.

                              Boeing have gone up a design cul-de-sac with their B737. The aircraft is set so low to the ground that they cannot accommodate bigger engines with larger front fans which are more efficient. So they first moved the engine accessory gearboxes from underneath to the side to give more ground clearance. Then on the ‘Max’ they moved the engines a long way forwards and up higher – almost in front of the wing – to give clearance, but this gave rise to controllability problems. Boeing then compounded this problem by a terrible half-arsed fix which relied on just a single AoA sensor. This single sensor was faulty on two Boeing 737 Max flights which then fatally crashed.

                              Coming back to the UK out of Florida one day in an Airbus A330; we had a landing gear problem: On the Airbus A330, the gear legs shorten as they are retracted, but on the left side the shortening mechanism sheered, so the leg did not shorten and was too long to fit the wheel bogey into the wheel well, (we discovered back on the ground). We followed the airborne drills which did not fix the problem, so we had to dump about 65 tonnes of fuel and then land again. The fault had slashed one of the tyres and damaged the wheel well doors.

                              We had to disembark the passengers, and after a few days of investigation by the engineers, we had to fly the aircraft back home empty, with the gear locked down. When we landed in Goose Bay to refuel, the broken shortening mechanism gave us more concerns, so after another few days of investigation, the engineers changed the entire left hand main landing gear before another crew flew the aircraft home !

                              Sorry, but I have no photos of this incident, which is a pity. Here is a photo of a (different) Airbus A330 during my walk-around at a different company, to show the general arrangement. A “low” wing is a relative term ! You can see a guy in a Hi-Viz jacket standing underneath the rear of the aircraft for scale. The wheel well doors under the fuselage are open here but are normally closed. The engineers must have been doing some checks.

                              Airbus A330. A beautifully designed aircraft and my favourite to fly.

                              9CD4A8B1-8751-4636-AF03-96D46E8586C8

                              #747482
                              ega
                              Participant
                                @ega

                                Biopic of gliding pioneer John J Montgomery on TPTV Freeview Ch 82 15.55 today.

                                #747536
                                Vic
                                Participant
                                  @vic
                                  On Peter Cook 6 Said:

                                  Birds evolved from four limbed dinosaurs. Four legged creatures typically have one at each corner for stability. Wings evolved from the front corners. It’s the same reason my arms are attached to my shoulders not my waist.

                                  I really like that description! It’s a shame I’ll never have the opportunity to repeat it in polite conversation. Thanks though. 😉

                                  #747537
                                  Vic
                                  Participant
                                    @vic

                                    I’ve always liked the look of large Military Transport Aircraft. I think much of this stems from the high wing position?

                                    IMG_1841

                                  Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
                                  • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

                                  Advert

                                  Latest Replies

                                  Home Forums The Tea Room Topics

                                  Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
                                  Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

                                  View full reply list.

                                  Advert

                                  Newsletter Sign-up